SEO News

They look like this

They load hella fast

Fairly obviously, given the name of the project (Google Accelerated Mobile Pages).

This new open source approach to HTML is designed precisely to enable seemingly instant loading of mobile pages.

Probably best to get the official Google Developers introduction, so here it is.

They intend to trump Facebook Instant Articles

The subtext to Google AMP is that Facebook Instant Articles is undemocratic and unpractical because it means publishers must work for Facebook’s gain.

Of course, the subtext is less important than the main aim of AMP, which is completely laudable; to improve mobile browsing, which is now dominant and yet far from optimised.

Nevertheless, it’s clear that Google has positioned the project as the true saviour of content distribution, free from the walled garden of Facebook (joyously naked and chomping on apples).

Here’s some text from the AMP website, which does everyting but name Facebook Instant Articles.

Given how frustrating the mobile web can be, many content distribution platforms are seeking alternatives. In many cases, these alternatives tend to be platform specific, placing a burden on the publishers to support this fragmentation of formats and closing off the ecosystem.

The Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) Project is an initiative to improve the mobile web and enhance the distribution ecosystem.

Some of the super-excited AMP partners also make the same point. Note the word ‘all’ in the following quote from Michael Ducker, Product Manager at Twitter.

We are thrilled to be working alongside Google and other industry leaders to create a better mobile web experience inside of all apps.

They are all about advertising

If mobile web pages are super quick, publishers might just be able to continue with their display advertising models.

Okay, the emperor may have been partially disrobed over 2015, with many finally preaching about non-existent clickthrough rates and poor UX (too many ads), but at least one of these problems can be alleviated by AMP.

Within AMP, all those scripts necessary to fire ads into your mobile phone are unlikely to slow things down and make you abandon your page load.

Google clearly sees this as a weapon in the fight to keep the web free for consumers (and profitable for the big G). So, maybe the ad blocker phenomenon isn’t such a big deal, after all?

Here’s the last word from Google:

If content is fast, flexible and beautiful, including compelling and effective ads, we can preserve the open web publishing model as well as the revenue streams so important to the sustainability of quality publishing.

They look like this

They load hella fast

Fairly obviously, given the name of the project (Google Accelerated Mobile Pages).

This new open source approach to HTML is designed precisely to enable seemingly instant loading of mobile pages.

Probably best to get the official Google Developers introduction, so here it is.

They intend to trump Facebook Instant Articles

The subtext to Google AMP is that Facebook Instant Articles is undemocratic and unpractical because it means publishers must work for Facebook’s gain.

Of course, the subtext is less important than the main aim of AMP, which is completely laudable; to improve mobile browsing, which is now dominant and yet far from optimised.

Nevertheless, it’s clear that Google has positioned the project as the true saviour of content distribution, free from the walled garden of Facebook (joyously naked and chomping on apples).

Here’s some text from the AMP website, which does everyting but name Facebook Instant Articles.

Given how frustrating the mobile web can be, many content distribution platforms are seeking alternatives. In many cases, these alternatives tend to be platform specific, placing a burden on the publishers to support this fragmentation of formats and closing off the ecosystem.

The Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) Project is an initiative to improve the mobile web and enhance the distribution ecosystem.

Some of the super-excited AMP partners also make the same point. Note the word ‘all’ in the following quote from Michael Ducker, Product Manager at Twitter.

We are thrilled to be working alongside Google and other industry leaders to create a better mobile web experience inside of all apps.

They are all about advertising

If mobile web pages are super quick, publishers might just be able to continue with their display advertising models.

Okay, the emperor may have been partially disrobed over 2015, with many finally preaching about non-existent clickthrough rates and poor UX (too many ads), but at least one of these problems can be alleviated by AMP.

Within AMP, all those scripts necessary to fire ads into your mobile phone are unlikely to slow things down and make you abandon your page load.

Google clearly sees this as a weapon in the fight to keep the web free for consumers (and profitable for the big G). So, maybe the ad blocker phenomenon isn’t such a big deal, after all?

Here’s the last word from Google:

If content is fast, flexible and beautiful, including compelling and effective ads, we can preserve the open web publishing model as well as the revenue streams so important to the sustainability of quality publishing.

The new view

Why did Google remove the ads?

Richard Hartley, PPC Director at Jellyfish

These days, Google is ‘mobile first’ due to mobile searches beginning to overtake desktop searches, and this move makes for a similar user experience across both. 

With fewer sponsored links, the overall quality should improve. The lowest position links (9,10,11) are the ones Google has deemed least likely to appeal to the user, and so removing them means that the quality of the remaining links is improved.

When there are fewer positions advertisers will have to bid more to get on the first page, and there’s much more incentive to hike bids to achieve position four. 

Dan Arad, Director of Product Management at Kenshoo

The decision likely comes as a result of continuous testing. As consumer behaviour evolves, it’s important for publishers to consider the user experience, how it can be bettered, and how ads can be most effective.

From an industry standpoint, Google is not the only publisher that has been experimenting with the number of ads and placements within the consumer experience. 

Facebook for example, has also adapted its desktop advertising, reducing the number of Newsfeed ads to improve relevance and quality and redesigning its ads in the right-hand column.

Kate Watts, Head of Bid Media at RocketMill

It will give Google more room to promote things such as PLAs (product listing ads), which should benefit positively from this change. 

It could also use the additional space to capitalise on other features in future. 

Marcus Knight, Head of Paid Search at 4Ps Marketing

Sidebar ads have always suffered in terms of click-through rate (CTR), which for me was probably the biggest factor.

If users are not interacting with an element of the Google experience, it makes sense that they would remove it. 

Judith Lewis, Owner at deCabbit Consultancy and tutor on Econsultancy’s PPC Training Course.

While this smaller ad may seem like it will result in more money, it will push some people out altogether as the return on investment (ROI) on clicks may stop making sense.

Ultimately those three or four top ads will cost more as more advertisers vie for the ad space there.

How will this impact PPC campaigns?

Dan Arad

With fewer ad slots available, impression levels will decline, and we expect keywords with higher traffic to become more competitive as brands invest in making sure they appear in the top spots.

This will be especially significant for popular head terms. 

As a result, it is likely CPCs will increase for those spots, although only desktop traffic should be affected. 

Although impressions and traffic may decline, expect clicks and overall click-through rates (CTR) to increase as ads on the top of paid search results have historically received significantly higher CTR than ads on the right.

Kate Watts

People on the cusp of positions four and five will be forced to increase their bids, or fall to the abyss that is the bottom of the page. 

Bids being raised in lower positions will have a knock-on effect up the SERP, raising the prices of higher positions too. 

For brands with a more modest advertising budget, it will limit the use of prospecting and generic keywords that were previously used when bidding for right hand side ad positions.

Brand campaigns are going to be increasingly necessary as the four adverts at the top of the SERPs push organic listings down even further, so there will be more of a need to bid on your own brand to fend off competitors’ paid ads.

Richard Hartley

The change will push the top organic link down the page – below the fold on some screen resolutions – and make it much less likely to be clicked on.

Do marketers need to do anything differently?

Marcus Knight

Whilst preparing for higher CPCs is a sensible action to take, I believe more focus should be placed on driving better quality advertising going forward.

User-centric ad copy, relevant landing pages, and a well structured account are all must-haves if you want to succeed in the newly updated market place. 

In short, all of the best practices we strive towards currently become even more important now are competing for fewer ad spots.

Judith Lewis

Make sure you are checking all keyword reports and removing (or adding negatives) keywords that do not serve you well, and add in exact matches of keywords really working well in their own separate campaigns with their own daily budget.

One thing I hope this change will do is convince businesses to take end-to-end tracking of sales more seriously and to re-evaluate their attribution modelling.

While there are several models (flat, last click, first click, u-shaped), the truth is more complex. Simplistic attribution modelling risks incorrect decisions being made based on flawed data. 

Make sure you understand your users and their journey to, and through, your site.

Kate Watts

Those advertisers with smaller budgets are likely to have to adopt new strategies, as bidding on short-term keywords will become too costly for them.

instead they will have to shift their focus to niche and highly relevant longer tail searches instead – in essence, far more thought will have to go into these strategies as the option to bid lower and appear in position five or six will be made redundant.

Richard Hartley

What remains to be seen is which competitors will increase bids in a kneejerk reaction, and if savvier advertisers will be able to ride out competing with advertisers who are not as shrewd.

Dan Arad

As a result of the change some advertisers may choose to diversify their programs across publishers and channels to maintain overall CPC levels. 

What do you think about the move? 

Will it impact on your PPC activity? Let us know in the comments below…

The new view

Why did Google remove the ads?

Richard Hartley, PPC Director at Jellyfish

These days, Google is ‘mobile first’ due to mobile searches beginning to overtake desktop searches, and this move makes for a similar user experience across both. 

With fewer sponsored links, the overall quality should improve. The lowest position links (9,10,11) are the ones Google has deemed least likely to appeal to the user, and so removing them means that the quality of the remaining links is improved.

When there are fewer positions advertisers will have to bid more to get on the first page, and there’s much more incentive to hike bids to achieve position four. 

Dan Arad, Director of Product Management at Kenshoo

The decision likely comes as a result of continuous testing. As consumer behaviour evolves, it’s important for publishers to consider the user experience, how it can be bettered, and how ads can be most effective.

From an industry standpoint, Google is not the only publisher that has been experimenting with the number of ads and placements within the consumer experience. 

Facebook for example, has also adapted its desktop advertising, reducing the number of Newsfeed ads to improve relevance and quality and redesigning its ads in the right-hand column.

Kate Watts, Head of Bid Media at RocketMill

It will give Google more room to promote things such as PLAs (product listing ads), which should benefit positively from this change. 

It could also use the additional space to capitalise on other features in future. 

Marcus Knight, Head of Paid Search at 4Ps Marketing

Sidebar ads have always suffered in terms of click-through rate (CTR), which for me was probably the biggest factor.

If users are not interacting with an element of the Google experience, it makes sense that they would remove it. 

Judith Lewis, Owner at deCabbit Consultancy and tutor on Econsultancy’s PPC Training Course.

While this smaller ad may seem like it will result in more money, it will push some people out altogether as the return on investment (ROI) on clicks may stop making sense.

Ultimately those three or four top ads will cost more as more advertisers vie for the ad space there.

How will this impact PPC campaigns?

Dan Arad

With fewer ad slots available, impression levels will decline, and we expect keywords with higher traffic to become more competitive as brands invest in making sure they appear in the top spots.

This will be especially significant for popular head terms. 

As a result, it is likely CPCs will increase for those spots, although only desktop traffic should be affected. 

Although impressions and traffic may decline, expect clicks and overall click-through rates (CTR) to increase as ads on the top of paid search results have historically received significantly higher CTR than ads on the right.

Kate Watts

People on the cusp of positions four and five will be forced to increase their bids, or fall to the abyss that is the bottom of the page. 

Bids being raised in lower positions will have a knock-on effect up the SERP, raising the prices of higher positions too. 

For brands with a more modest advertising budget, it will limit the use of prospecting and generic keywords that were previously used when bidding for right hand side ad positions.

Brand campaigns are going to be increasingly necessary as the four adverts at the top of the SERPs push organic listings down even further, so there will be more of a need to bid on your own brand to fend off competitors’ paid ads.

Richard Hartley

The change will push the top organic link down the page – below the fold on some screen resolutions – and make it much less likely to be clicked on.

Do marketers need to do anything differently?

Marcus Knight

Whilst preparing for higher CPCs is a sensible action to take, I believe more focus should be placed on driving better quality advertising going forward.

User-centric ad copy, relevant landing pages, and a well structured account are all must-haves if you want to succeed in the newly updated market place. 

In short, all of the best practices we strive towards currently become even more important now are competing for fewer ad spots.

Judith Lewis

Make sure you are checking all keyword reports and removing (or adding negatives) keywords that do not serve you well, and add in exact matches of keywords really working well in their own separate campaigns with their own daily budget.

One thing I hope this change will do is convince businesses to take end-to-end tracking of sales more seriously and to re-evaluate their attribution modelling.

While there are several models (flat, last click, first click, u-shaped), the truth is more complex. Simplistic attribution modelling risks incorrect decisions being made based on flawed data. 

Make sure you understand your users and their journey to, and through, your site.

Kate Watts

Those advertisers with smaller budgets are likely to have to adopt new strategies, as bidding on short-term keywords will become too costly for them.

instead they will have to shift their focus to niche and highly relevant longer tail searches instead – in essence, far more thought will have to go into these strategies as the option to bid lower and appear in position five or six will be made redundant.

Richard Hartley

What remains to be seen is which competitors will increase bids in a kneejerk reaction, and if savvier advertisers will be able to ride out competing with advertisers who are not as shrewd.

Dan Arad

As a result of the change some advertisers may choose to diversify their programs across publishers and channels to maintain overall CPC levels. 

What do you think about the move? 

Will it impact on your PPC activity? Let us know in the comments below…

Posted by rMaynes1

[Estimated read time: 6 minutes]

There’s a lot of talk about ad viewability at present, and with big players such as Google announcing in 2015 that it would only charge advertisers for 100% viewable impressions, it’s easy to see how it’s become such a hot topic in the digital marketing world.

But what exactly does it mean to be “viewable?” Does this mean people will look at your ad? We recently conducted a research study that set out to answer these questions.

Conducting the eye-tracking study

The study was conducted in two parts: an online survey of 1400 participants for quantitative data, and an eye-tracking study designed to observe actual behaviors of searchers online — more qualitative data.

The goal was to measure the type of ads people noticed and engaged with the most, determining whether behavior changed depending on the intent behind the search task (research or purchase) and the relevancy of the ad. We also wanted to determine how viewable online display ads truly are and what other factors influenced whether or not people viewed them.

Participants performed tasks in Mediative’s lab while being recorded using the Tobii T60 desktop eye tracker. The key metrics measured were:

• Time to First Fixation – How long it took the searcher to fixate on an ad. A fixation is when we hold our eyes still and actually take in visual information. A typical fixation lasts from 100–300 milliseconds, and we generally fixate 3–4 times every second (Source: tobii.com).
• Total Visit Duration – How long the searcher spent in total fixating on the ad.
• Visit Count – How many times the searcher came back to look at the ad.
• Percentage Fixated – The percentage of all participants who looked at the ad.
• Percentage Clicked – The percentage of all participants who clicked on the ad.

A participant conducting a calibration test on the T60 Tobii Eye-tracker in Mediative’s research lab

“The findings in this study are a powerful reminder to create engaging advertising programs that responsibly leverage first- and second-party data. Marketers are still better off complimenting user experiences than disrupting them.”

– Sonia Carreno, President, Interactive Advertising Bureau of Canada

What is viewability?

“Viewability,” as defined by the Media Ratings Council, means an ad has 50% of its pixels in view for a minimum of one second. Essentially, an ad is viewable if there’s an opportunity for it to be viewed. 76% of ads in Mediative’s study were served in a “viewable” position as defined above.

An opportunity for an ad to be viewed, however, does not mean that it will be viewed. 16.6% of the ads that were served throughout the study were viewed. 50% more ads were viewed above the fold compared to below the fold, and ads above the fold were viewed for 87% longer.

Increasing viewability to increase views

Although click-through rate is a clear indicator of whether an ad was viewed or not, it doesn’t give the whole picture. It gives no measurement of how many ads were seen, but not clicked on. Therefore, CTR cannot be the sole measurement of a display ad campaign’s success. Ads can be seen, noticed, and influence a purchase — all without generating a click.

Buying a viewable ad impression is only the first step, however. Here are some areas for you to consider improving in order to maximize the chances of your display ads being seen.

1. Ad relevancy

The research showed that ads relevant to the searcher’s current task are 80% more likely to be noticed than ads relevant to something the searcher had looked for in the past. Additionally, ads relevant to the search query are viewed for 67% longer than irrelevant ads. Relevant ads were visited on average 2.59 times per visitor per page, versus only 1.6 times for irrelevant ads. Relevant ads received 5.7x more clicks.

Below are heat maps for web pages containing two big box ads. The page on the left features an ad that was irrelevant to the search task. The page on the right features a relevant ad. The areas in red had the most views, followed by orange, yellow, and green.

Your action item:

You can advertise on sites that are relevant to the audience you are trying to reach (e.g. a car ad on a car information site). However, adding data into campaigns and purchasing impressions in real-time will increase the relevancy of your ads, no matter the site the user is visiting. With demographic data and/or intent- and interest-based data, specific audiences of people can be targeted, rather than specific sites. This is more likely to result in a higher return on ad investments, as impressions land on the most likely buyers.

2. Ad type

In a survey, we asked people which ads they pay attention to the most on a webpage. The responses show that people believe they pay attention to the leaderboard ads at the top of the page the most. Our eye-tracking study confirmed that, yes, this ad type was noticed the fastest, and by the most people.

However, it was the ads to the side of the page (skyscraper ads) and within the page content (big box ads) that were viewed for the longest and received the most clicks. A November 2014 report by Google had similar findings, reporting that the most viewable ads on a page are those that are positioned just above the fold, not at the top of the page.

Your action item:

Don’t rule out ads that might traditionally have poor click performance. This doesn’t mean the ad isn’t seen!

3. Ad design

Poor display ad design is often to blame for a poor click-through rate; if people don’t notice the ad, they won’t click it. When it comes to online display ads, images, videos, and animations are more important than what’s actually being said with the text.

Your action item:

Invest in good ad creative. Keep ads simple, yet eye-catching. Ensure the ad features a clear call-to-action to indicate why the searcher should click on your ad so that they don’t lose interest.

4. Multiple ad exposures

Multiple relevant ads on the same page were viewed, on average, by 2.7x more participants and captured 2.8x more clicks than the individual relevant ads.

Multiple ads shown several times across different pages increase in engagement the more times they’re shown. The average number of clicks increased by 162% between one exposure and two, and by 39% between two exposures and three.

Your action item:

Consider advertising placements such as home page takeovers or run-of-site/run-of-network advertising, where multiple exposures of the same ad will be served. Retargeted ads will also likely result in multiple exposures to the same ad. When retargeted ads were presented to a searcher, they were viewed, on average, 65% faster than ads that were not retargeted.

In summary

Ultimately, what we’ve discovered through this research is that buying a “viewable” ad impression does not guarantee that it’s going to be seen and/or clicked on, and that there are many ways you can maximize the chances of your ad being viewed. It’s critical to understand, however, that online ad success cannot be determined by views and clicks to an ad alone. The entire customer’s purchase journey must be considered, and how ads can influence behavior at different stages. Display advertising is just one part of an integrated digital campaign for most advertisers.

For more tips on how to maximize display ad viewability, download the full Mediative paper for free.

Let us know your thoughts and questions in the comments!

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!