2 Seconds to Brand Impact: A Modern Video Ads Playbook
Would you believe it: Almost no one watches your video ads! Take your company employee hat off: Do you watch any other company’s video ads, if you have the choice to skip or swipe? Do you watch your company’s ads, if you have the choice to skip or swipe? The answer for you, me, our employee peers is likely no. Reason: Just as for our users… The ad’s in the way. When producing advertising, here’s the reality CMOs ignore: You are not competing against other ads. You are competing against the entire internet. All of it. If a human is actively watching your 60s ad on TV all the way to the end, the most likely reason is her phone’s battery is dead. Pause for reflection. This blog post was originally published as edition #489 of my newsletter TMAI Premium. Each week, I share strategic insights and actionable guidance on how to stay at the very bleeding edge of Marketing, Analytics, and AI-transformation. Sign up for TMAI Premium to accelerate your career trajectory. 100% of TMAI revenues are donated to charity. I am not advocating against video advertising. It is essential for effective and scalable brand marketing. I am advocating for ad creatives to embrace the decade-old reality of consumer behavior, media consumption, and attention fragmentation. I am for video advertising strategies that are built to recognize that attention is the most expensive currency on earth. To make the case for just how important this is… Here’s my synthesis of the data illustrating the average seconds of attention paid in each media channel, how much of that attention is with sound on (more effective!), and how much of your ad is watched all the way to the end… Video Ads: Attention Metrics [For a higher resolution image: Right mouse click > Open image in new tab.] Sobering, no? Big Insight: Active attention to an ad is contextual. And, brief. Increasingly: Just the first two seconds. Big Implication: A 60s TV ad is now, functionally, a 15-second ad with 45 seconds of background noise for most viewers. A 15s TikTok video ad is now, functionally, a 1s display ad view. Big Disappointment: Your Brand Marketing is largely delivering zero brand lift when measured with true test-control brand lift studies. If you are producing ads (“stories”) longer than 30 seconds – like the one- to five-minute sappy holiday creatives common this time of year – you are doing that purely for your own entertainment. Protect your career by not promising any business profits. The data above also explains why your TikTok / Reels / YT Shorts ad campaigns have almost never delivered brand lift with an above zero confidence interval – a massive waste of precious creative & Marketing budgets. [Note: TMAI Premium subscribers, carefully review TMAI #447: Confidence Intervals: A Brand Analytics MUST Have. Please email me if you do not have my awesome Excel model to compute your campaign’s real impact.] Why obsess about this? Effective Brand Marketing is the only way to grow Market Share over time. Video ads are a necessary tactic in that holy quest. Let’s embrace real consumer behavior, media consumption, and attention fragmentation. Shorter video ads. And, regardless of the ad length, front-loaded video ads with high-impact first two seconds. Wait, Wait, Wait… Loooong Ads Are Better! Like me, I’m confident you’ve heard a variation of this from your VP of Creative / Global Creative Director / CMO: Long creatives tell a better story, and people remember better stories. What does the data say? Data Fact One: Studies by Facebook’s Brand Lift team, Google/YT ABCDs find that shorter ads (6-15s) often drive equal or higher lifts in Ad Recall and Consideration than longer ads. (In part because they are less likely to be skipped or are unskippable.) Data Fact Two: Quantifying that… Research (Lumen/Teads) identifies that 15s ads drive 75-85% of the recall of a 30s ad – at half the media cost (Magna/IPG). Data Fact Three: If they hold attention throughout, longer ads (30s+) can drive higher emotional intensity and long-term brand affinity. Your VP, Director, CMO is right… Longer ads have additional value to offer! To deliver that special magic, long ad creatives have to solve three problems: 1. The long ad needs to be built to solve a different, long-term purpose. 2. If you just want to drive Unaided Brand Awareness, Consideration, or Purchase Intent, you can do so more efficiently with a shorter ad, while lowering resentment risk. The long ad creative needs to be super magnificently effective in the first 1-4 seconds. The creative has to be able to avoid the Skip / Swipe in skippable ad formats, and avoid the human looking away / going to the bathroom / looking down at their phone in the case of non-skippable formats. 3. The long ad creative needs to be supported by 3x – 6x additional media budget – when compared to the 15s ad media budget – to deliver the promised higher emotional intensity. Life Changing Insight: The modern battle for brand lift isn’t won by one long story; it is won by frequency of short, high-impact moments. No matter your ad length, if your ad is not seen x number of times over y weeks, it will not deliver impact. [Note: Premium subscribers deep dive and incorporate: TMAI #431: Impact of Ad Length on Campaign Cost.] It is difficult to meet these three magic-producing criteria, but it can be done. Use the ad length that is optimal for the business purpose you are solving for. Don’t use a jumbo jet to commute to Manhattan. Don’t try to cycle from NY to Chicago. Regardless of ad length/purpose, I’m confident you noticed that you really need to make the first two, three, seconds count. [Special Advice: The Ad Sales team at one particular ad platform aggressively champions the cause of looooooooooong ads. If you run into them, set all else aside and ask one question: How do we get distribution for the looooooooooong ads? If you get an affordable, scalable answer that spike and sustains, follow their advice.] An Ideal Video Ads Media Plan. Recognizing that effective Brand Marketing via video ads is not a one-size-fits-all, I want to sketch this starting point for your video ads strategy: Spark: 6s “Bumpers” / equivalent, will take a majority of your media budget (55-65%). They build frequency, recognition, and sustain your brand lift gains. Fuel: 15s / equivalent, will take nearly all of the rest of your media budget (25-35%). Ideally, sequenced with effective 6s ads so they would have gained interest to hear the rest of the story. Blaze: An occasional 30s (ideally non-skip) taking the remaining budget (5-8%), in big spike moments to support a specific brand feeling. Beacon: A rare, beautiful 60s film, not as an ad (0%), but organically seeded on social channels, shown in internal company meetings, submitted for industry awards. There can be small, occasional, variations. From my experience across industries and countries… For retail type companies, Spark takes up 70%. For B2B, Fuel can be up to 40%. For a revolutionary new product/company, Blaze temporarily can be 20%. Repetition: You will notice I’m consistently prioritizing frequency over length. Effective Brand Marketing is frequency-powered in an age where attention is the most expensive currency. Second repetition: Regardless of length, each type of video ad will have to start front-loaded, with a BANG. The first few seconds are critical to plant a memory, to generate interest in seeing rest of the story. Let’s learn how to do that. How to Be Creative: Zero 2 Interest in Two Seconds! Across all social video, users pay only 12 seconds of active ad attention for every hour(!!). Implication: Your share of voice is infinitesimal unless you disrupt their pattern. To do that, you have one to three seconds max. I’ll share data-identified effective creative tactics, for each channel. But first, there are five creative tactics that apply regardless of channel. Big 5 Universal Creative Effectiveness Truths. 1. Brand in 3. The brand must be recognizable within 3 seconds (logo, color, sonic signature, character). 2. Frame-One Impact. The first visual frame must tell a story or pose a question. (It is insanely difficult, that is what it takes to win.) 3. Sound as Lead, Not Support. Music, voice tone, and audio pacing drive emotional response faster than visual. 4. The “Why Now?” Answer the viewer’s unconscious question: “Why should I care about this right now?” (Reminder: Your ad’s competing against all the content on the internet.) 5. Creative Pre-Tested. The only way to win before you spend is to pre-test your creative – and ensure it passed in your ad’s media channel and your intended audience. For Concepts and high media weight Executions, use HMM Pro. For high volume, low media weight Executions, TikTok/Shorts/Reels, use HMM AI. These are super high standards for your creative teams to meet. In a world where you’ll get 12 seconds of ad attention per hour… Recommendations 1 – 5 above are mandatory. If you feel your video ads are falling short of the above truths: A. That explains why you can’t prove an iota of incremental impact from Brand Marketing on long-term Revenue. B. That should be a reason you pause your current video ad spend until your creative team/agency can deliver worthy creative. The Build Effective Creative Journey Continues. Every channel has its nuances. What works on TV rarely works on YouTube. What works on Reels often does not work for Facebook. Mobile video ads needs different Big Bang Two-Second start than if they are served on CTV. In TMAI #490 I’ve shared detailed best practices I’ve validated through testing and media tactics individually for Linear TV, CTV, YouTube Skippable, Facebook/Instagram Feed, TikTok/Reels/Shorts, and Snapchat. Lessons from approx. $10 bil in brand marketing spend analyzed. If you are a new TMAI Premium member, please email me if you can’t find edition 490 with detailed Part 2. If you are not, grab an annual Premium subscription here – the insights will transform your professional effectiveness! Bottom line. Our belief in the power of story is correct. Our canvas has changed. The 60-second spot is not dead, as illustrated above, it has a purpose in a Beacon strategy on free channels and for earning awards. The 60-second ad as interruption is dead. It does not perform as a media strategy. (Neither is there much inventory to buy. The platforms know it does not work!) Short-form creative is how we earn attention, and earn permission to tell our (slightly) longer, richer story. We are not abandoning our craft. Our quest remains legendary brand lift! The path we take to get there is new. Carpe diem. Avinash. PS: In the world of Chinese livestream sales, Zheng Xiang Xiang’s approach is super impressive. She sells 100 million Yuan ($19m) of products in a week. Don’t emulate it. Xiang Xiang operates within available attention. Appreciate that to become a better Marketer.
The post 2 Seconds to Brand Impact: A Modern Video Ads Playbook appeared first on Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik.
Loss Recovery Growth Model: Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)
With the slow and steady evolution from keyword searching to resolution questions typed into Answer Engines, you are going to lose traffic (and revenue) somewhere in the rage of -18% to -64% during the course of the next calendar year. Today, our challenge is three-fold: A. How can you identify the size of your loss? B. What can you do to recover some losses? C. What actions can you take to take advantage of this shift and grow revenues? Every smart company is building a forecasting model to estimate these three life-critical dimensions. Let me make that important exercise a little easier for you. My model will help you estimate your losses, identify opportunities to recover, and share actions, and by how much each can drive growth. You can use the model to have strategic conversations with your CEO, CFO, and help your CMO create a clear, prioritized, list of actions (including hiring new staff with relevant expertise). This blog post was originally published as edition #482 of my newsletter, TMAI Premium. Each week, the newsletter shares strategic frameworks and practical here’s how to stay at the very bleeding edge of CFO-proof Marketing and Analytics. Sign up for TMAI Premium to accelerate your career trajectory. The Librarian to Grad Assistant Search Transformation. Past: When the User asked a question, traditional Google was a librarian. It did not know answers, it pointed us to a section of the library – four plus ten blue links – and said the answer is highly likely to be in these books, good luck. As a business, our job: Be the most attractive, relevant, authoritative book on the shelf, and/or pay to put our book on the special display by the front door of the library. Present: When the User asks a question, the new Answer Engine is the ruthlessly efficient grad research assistant. It goes to the library. It reads the 14 relevant books from a billion books, synthesizes the information, writes a perfect one-page summary directly answering the question. Most businesses lose the clicks, one or two get the click now – and even that we might not get as the Answer Engine absorbs ecommerce, and as AEs become Agentic eliminating the human step altogether. ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Claude are examples of Answer Engines. AI Mode in Google, now out in 40 countries, is also an example of an Answer Engine experience. ChatGPT Agent, Rufus from Amazon are examples of AE experiences that get close to Agentic search – humans need only express a wish; the agent does everything else. Learning, shopping, homework, will never be the same again. My recent AEO newsletter series, six editions (!), covered the changes underway, the actions you need to take on your digital experience, your organic and paid strategies, new measurement to embrace, and how you can prepare to live in an Agentic “Search” world. If you’ve not read that almost mini-book, please do. It is critical to understand the nuance and detail of this conversation. [Note: If you are a new Annual Premium Subscriber, please email me. I’ll be happy to share the six-part series with you.] Here’s a picture I sketched for a recent keynote on AEO, outlining the transformation underway… And, the implications… The completed forecast model will cover items 1 through 5 in the picture above, which are raised from these three questions for every business: 1. How much traffic will we lose? (Organic & Paid) 2. Given the librarian shift, how much of this loss can we recover? (Not all.) 3. Can I take advantage of this shift and grow new traffic? (Yes.) Let’s answer. The Business Losses Are Here (And, Accelerating). The change in user behavior above (in blue) is driving a change in the user experience (in black). Ex: Answers take up most of the real estate, with the answer often reducing the need to go to a downstream site. Ex: Paid ads might come, but for now there are either no ads or few ads (below the fold). Both create losses. My expectation is that the losses will accelerate in 2026. Important note: Losses, Recover & Grow will have different answers for different companies. Ex: For many publishers (news, magazine, content), the loss in traffic is already large, and permanent. These entities will need a phoenix type rebirth. I am going to focus on normal businesses: Ecommerce-type entities, B2B & B2C where the earning of revenue is a short, medium, long-term objective. 1. Factors driving losses in SEO Traffic. Informational queries are at the highest risk. These are the what is, how to, and best of queries. They represent, what some people call, top of the funnel. AEs are designed to directly answer these. Commercial queries are close to the highest risk. These are the vs queries, comparisons. Lenovo ThinkPad Snapdragon vs. Asus Zenbook A14. These are very high value queries, AEs will not generate an on-the-fly custom comparison table and even tell you to buy the Zenbook (btw, I have one and it is spectacular!). Non-brand High-Intent Transactional queries are at moderate risk. These are the user typing “buy men’s waterproof hiking shoes for an Alaska trip.” The current UX is that the AE will provide a handful of recommendations, with a summary of why. The user will click fewer times, and your organic category page will be ineffective. Branded & Navigational queries are at low risk. These are “Kate Spade Black Friday Sale.” Or “Coach Tabby in loved leather.” The AE will deliver the traffic to you, as that is the intent of the human. In future iterations, there might be insertion of things like “site links,” which might be a small risk. [Bigger lesson: Brand Marketing has never been more critical!] So, what’s the potential loss through the year 2026 of no AEO action by your company? Let us assume you currently get 5,000,000 visits from Organic Search, and the Revenue Per Visit (Total Organic Revenue/Total Visits) is $2.5. Based on my research, conversations with the top LLMs, competitive intelligence tool builders, and my judgment, here’s the section of the model that proposes the potential losses due to SEO (as Users shift from old-school searching to resolution queries in AE experiences): From an anticipated Revenue of $12.5m, a potential loss of $4m is coming your way. [Note: Annual Premium Subscribers received a full working Excel forecasting model, with losses, recovery, grow included. If you’ve misplace it, or are a new Subscriber, please email me.] Your to-do is to go to your Digital Analytics tool and take your current Organic Search traffic and compute the size of your Informational, Commercial, Non-Brand Transactional, and Branded & Navigational. Then, update column 2 (% of Current Visits). The rest of the cells will update and you’ll see your real losses. My assessment of Potential Loss in each row is conservative, and for “strong brand ecommerce” type business. If your business is different, please invest in research and update that column. With so much changing all at the same time, it is difficult to predict user behavior shifts with 100% accuracy. Consider the loss estimates as the best educated markers. They could happen much faster, could take a little bit of time, but if you stretch over the year 2026, you will broadly be in this range. Hence… Time. For. Action! 4. Factors driving losses in PPC Traffic. The threat to Paid Search is different, and just as scary. It is defined by two words: Transformation, and displacement. Remember, for now, none of the LLMs have advertising as a business model (though, it is too lucrative to resist ads for monetization). That’s displacement. Google, with the largest Search business to protect, will surely have ads in AI Mode, but for now they will look different and seem to be below the fold. Bing is trying new ad formats in its version of AI Mode. This is Transformation. Translation: Fewer options for you to pay to get clicks. Let’s use the same categorization as SEO to reflect on risks. Informational queries represent the same high risk of loss. Setting aside the no ads and below the fold ads issues, the entire purpose of Answer Engines is to answer. Hence, budget spent on informational questions will likely be completely wasted. The User is likely to ignore the ad, and certainly not scroll for ads below the fold. Commercial queries hold a giant point of friction. Our paid ads for, say, “best shoes for hiking,” will compete with the Answer Engine’s AI-analyzed answer for… best hiking shoes! Unless by the grace of God your brand was the AI’s assessment of the right answer, your text ad will lose the fight for attention. Non-Brand High-Intent Transactional queries are likely the bulk of your current ad spend. Ex: buy waterproof hiking shoes for a trip to Alaska. The risk here is not elimination, rather it is format shift. Ex: Text ad slots with breadcrumbs are being replaced with one (or two) AI-powered carousels. The four ad slots were clearly visible; in a carousel format that might not be the case. AEs are likely to have new approaches to Ad Quality Score (tied to now their superior understanding of the user’s intent), this might make it harder for your ad to show up. Other as yet unpredictable ad “innovations.” Branded & Navigational queries, as with SEO, are likely to have a lower risk of reduction. (But, as with your brand keyword ads today, when you measure them today on the basis of Incrementality, using CLS, you will find that they have very low incrementality. So… You should not be buying ads today. Definitely not in Answer Engines either – it is in their vested interest for them to send a user with your brand intent to you. [Note: There is another threat to Navigational and Branded ads. Buying seems to be moving directly into the Answer Engines. This might mean more wins for your competition, and certainly fewer cross and up-sell opportunities for you (lower AOV). Both, not fun.] So, what’s the potential PPC loss through the year 2026 of no AEO action by your company? Assuming $7m annual Visits, with Value Per Visit of $2.5… Here’s my model to help direct your strategic choices: From an anticipated Revenue of $17.5m, a potential loss of $4.6m coming your way over the course of CY 2026. As with SEO forecast, update your Traffic and Value Per Visit numbers from your Google Analytics data. Cluster the keywords you are buying into Informational, Commercial, Non-Brand Transactional, and Branded & Navigational. Update the column titled “% Current Visits.” The rest of the cells will fill in. Compute your potential losses. Take both of these tables to your next CxO strategic conversation. Have a good group cry. Then, start a little Marshall project to kick off urgent action. A Humbling Realization. Recognizing that every company is unique, even similar ones, and hence predicted outcomes will vary… My assessment here of the potential Loss for each query cluster is conservative. Additionally, I’ve assumed that you do everything I’ve urged you to do in TMAI #469: AEO Exp & PPC, TMAI #470: AEO Content FTW. If you have not, the non-positive impact will be significantly higher. So, pelase do not delay understanding and the urgent need to influence your company culture. The Modeling Journey Continues. Good news: You can recover some of your losses! Excellent news: You can take bold action right now, earlier than your competitors, to grow your traffic and revenue in an Answer Engine world!! The grow possibilities are substantial for some industries. TMAI Premium editions #483 and #484, outlined specific Recovery and Growth actions, and anticipated positive percentage impact of each action. They would specifically apply to ecommerce-type entities, B2B & B2C where the earning of revenue is a short-, medium-, and long-term objective. Using the format above, the model offers the same for Paid Ads. If you are a new Premium member, you can email me for the complete forecasting model. Bottom line. Every user behavior transition brings adjustments that businesses have to make. This is one such moment, happens to be the once-in-a-generation kind. Even when so much is unknown, you now have a clear and helpful model to start to quantify the size of the impact. That gives you power to take control of your destiny. Get your team ready to recover, and even grow. Carpe diem. PS: As you execute all of my recommeded actions, you’ll have an intelligent program of Answer Engine Analytics (AEA) to measure success, identify new opportunities. Here’s a helpful sketch, by our friend Gemini, of my Big 5 recommendations:
The post Loss Recovery Growth Model: Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) appeared first on Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik.
Marketing: Win Before You Spend: Pre-Test Creative + Media Sufficiency.
The most important lesson in Marketing is also the simplest: Successful Marketing requires incredible Creative, and sufficient Media weight. Simple, no? Yet, in my experience, it is rare that either part of that equation is understood or optimally executed. This disappointing reality limits the success for your Performance Marketing campaigns, and is death for your […]
The post Marketing: Win Before You Spend: Pre-Test Creative + Media Sufficiency. appeared first on Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik.
High-Impact Marketing: Rock Creative Pre-Testing!
Prologue. Recent Conversation with CEO B: Me: I saw your ad at the airport the other day. I have a sense for your challenges and Marketing objectives. I’m sorry, but that ad was heartbreaking. I sense it is trying to be too clever. And, it demands an immense amount of attention to understand, who in […]
The post High-Impact Marketing: Rock Creative Pre-Testing! appeared first on Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik.
Marketing Analytics: Attribution Is Not Incrementality
One of the business side effects of the pandemic is that it has put a very sharp light on Marketing budgets. This is a very good thing under all circumstances, but particularly beneficial in times when most companies are not doing so well financially. There is a sharper focus on Revenue/Profit. From there, it is […]
The post Marketing Analytics: Attribution Is Not Incrementality appeared first on Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik.
Clubhouse: popular kids’ hangout or a true asset for brands’ community building?
Is Clubhouse really worth the hype? Explore how brands can use Clubhouse to build an online community to further add value and drive engagement
The post Clubhouse: popular kids’ hangout or a true asset for brands’ community building? appeared first on Search Engine Watch.
The Benefits of Marketing Deja Vu
Repetitive messaging and giving consumers that sense of deja vu when they see your brand will help brands to gain trust and convert. Find out more in this post from Hannah Thorpe.
Post from Hannah Thorpe
Stop All Social Media Activity (Organic) | Solve For A Profitable Reality
Life is short. It is time to point out an ugly truth, and to be the brave person that you are, the intelligent rational assessor of reality that you are, and kill all the organic social media activity by your company. All of it. Seems radical, but let’s take it one step at a time. […]
Stop All Social Media Activity (Organic) | Solve For A Profitable Reality is a post from: Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik
Getting Yourself Heard – a Case Study from the Music Industry
How do you improve your brand`s chances of being heard online? Laura Phillips looks at three ladies who were thrown into the limelight and how they increased their online presence.
Post from Laura Phillips on State of Digital
Getting Yourself Heard – a Case Study from the Music Industry
Digital Design & User Experience Best Practices: Happiness + Profits!
We have more data than God wants anyone to have. We have more talent deployed than was ever true in history. We have more money being pumped into our ecosystem than ever before. We have our senior leadership involved like never before. Yet the end result of all that is so far away from where […]
Digital Design & User Experience Best Practices: Happiness + Profits! is a post from: Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik
Six Visual Solutions To Complex Digital Marketing/Analytics Challenges
Two things I love a lot: 1. Frameworks, because if I can teach someone a new mental model, a different way of thinking, they can be incredibly successful. 2. Visuals, because if I can paint a simple picture about something complex it means I understand it and in turn I can explain it to others. […]
Six Visual Solutions To Complex Digital Marketing/Analytics Challenges is a post from: Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik