UserInteraction Schema For SEO & Social?
A WebmasterWorld thread has a webmaster who asked if Google will give him a boost because one piece of his content on his site hit over 1,000 Facebook likes.
It is one of those weird questions that makes you nod your head sideways. Why?
Video Recap of Weekly Search Buzz :: January 3, 2014
It was a slow week in search, being New Years and all but we still covered some fun topics. Do you need to use structure data to survive in search…
SEER’s Ultimate 2014 PPC Wish List
While we certainly don’t hope for another radical change from 2014, like 2013′s Enhanced campaign migration, the SEER team has shared their PPC wishes for the new year. From updates to Google and Bing to social platforms, we have compiled SEER’s wish list of what we are looking for from PPC in 2014. Once you […]
The State of Digital Marketing in 2014 (Infographic)
The State of Digital Marketing in the upcoming year. An infographic provides to us by Webmarketing 123.
Post from Bas Admin on State of Digital
The State of Digital Marketing in 2014 (Infographic)
Preparing For The Link Apocalypse That May Or May Not Be Coming
Something big is happening to link building. Hummingbird might have been the writing on the wall signaling more changes to come; but, we still have no idea what those changes will actually look like. Will links be less important in 2014? Is it possible that they could go away? Should I start link…
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
The Art of the Media Interview
One of the ultimate goals of the media relations facet of PR is to become the go-to person for interviews in your space. When the media starts coming to you for comment, you know your PR efforts are really paying off.
Search In Pics: Glasshole Receipt, GDG Gingerbread Cookies & Penguin Popper
In this week’s Search In Pictures, here are the latest images culled from the web, showing what people eat at the search engine companies, how they play, who they meet, where they speak, what toys they have, and more. Glasshole Printed On Bar Receipt: Source: Google+ GDG Gingerbread Cookies:…
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
Link Building the Right Way in 2014
Link building, if done correctly, isn’t cheap or easy. If your objective is to improve a website’s visibility in organic search results, then relevant links are still the best way to do so in 2014. But you’ll need to invest and avoid link schemes.
6 Essential Elements for Mobile SEO Success in 2014
Adopting a successful mobile SEO strategy as part of your overall SEO strategy will undoubtedly give your organization a competitive advantage in 2014. Here are five essential elements to ensure your mobile SEO investments pay off.
5 Essential Elements for Mobile SEO Success in 2014
Adopting a successful mobile SEO strategy as part of your overall SEO strategy will undoubtedly give your organization a competitive advantage in 2014. Here are five essential elements to ensure your mobile SEO investments pay off.
Gray Hat Search Engineering
Almost anyone in internet marketing who has spent a couple months in the game has seen some “shocking” case study where changing the color of a button increased sales 183% or such. In many cases such changes only happen when the original site had not had any focus on conversion at all.
Google, on the other hand, has billions of daily searches and is constantly testing ways to increase yield:
The company was considering adding another sponsored link to its search results, and they were going to do a 30-day A/B test to see what the resulting change would be. As it turns out, the change brought massive returns. Advertising revenues from those users who saw more ads doubled in the first 30 days.
…
By the end of the second month, 80 percent of the people in the cohort that was being served an extra ad had started using search engines other than Google as their primary search engine.
One of the reasons traditional media outlets struggle with the web is the perception that ads and content must be separated. When they had regional monopolies they could make large demands to advertisers – sort of like how Google may increase branded CPCs on AdWords by 500% if you add sitelinks. You not only pay more for clicks that you were getting for free, but you also pay more for the other paid clicks you were getting cheaper in the past.
That’s how monopolies work – according to Eric Schmidt they are immune from market forces.
Search itself is the original “native ad.” The blend confuses many searchers as the background colors fade into white.
Google tests colors & can control the flow of traffic based not only on result displacement, but also the link colors.
It was reported last month that Google tested adding ads to the knowledge graph. The advertisement link is blue, while the ad disclosure is to the far right out of view & gray.
I was searching for a video game yesterday & noticed that now the entire Knowledge Graph unit itself is becoming an ad unit. Once again, gray disclosure & blue ad links.
Where Google gets paid for the link, the link is blue.
Where Google scrapes third party content & shows excerpts, the link is gray.

The primary goal of such a knowledge block is result displacement – shifting more clicks to the ads and away from the organic results.
When those blocks appear in the search results, even when Google manages to rank the Mayo Clinic highly, it’s below the fold.

What’s so bad about this practice in health
- Context Matters: Many issues have overlapping symptoms where a quick glance at a few out-of-context symptoms causes a person to misdiagnose themselves. Flu-like symptoms from a few months ago turned out to be indication of a kidney stone. That level of nuance will *never* be in the knowledge graph. Google’s remote rater documents discuss your money your life (YMYL) topics & talk up the importance of knowing who exactly is behind content, but when they use gray font on the source link for their scrape job they are doing just the opposite.
- Hidden Costs: Many of the heavily advertised solutions appearing above the knowledge graph have hidden costs yet to be discovered. You can’t find a pharmaceutical company worth $10s of billions that hasn’t plead guilty to numerous felonies associated with deceptive marketing and/or massaging research.
- Artificially Driving Up Prices: in-patent drugs often cost 100x as much as the associated generic drugs & thus the affordable solutions are priced out of the ad auctions where the price for a click can vastly exceed than the profit from selling a generic prescription drug.
Where’s the business model for publishers when they have real editorial cost & must fact check and regularly update their content, their content is good enough to be featured front & center on Google, but attribution is nearly invisible (and thus traffic flow is cut off)? As the knowledge graph expands, what does that publishing business model look like in the future?
Does the knowledge graph eventually contain sponsored self-assessment medical quizzes? How far does this cancer spread?
Where do you place your chips?
Google believes it can ultimately fulfil people’s data needs by sending results directly to microchips implanted into its user’s brains.
Google: Can’t Crawl Your Robots.txt Then We Stop Crawling Your Site
Did you know that if Google cannot crawl your robots.txt file, that it will stop crawling your whole site…
Spammers Cold Calling Local Businesses – Claiming They Need To Update Their Business Listings
Baruch Labunski from Rank Secure in Canada pinged me the other day asking me why I can’t stop the phone calls he is getting from spammers claiming implying they are from Google…
Google Kills Location History Summary Dashboard
Google has dropped support for the location history dashboard. Alex Chitu first covered this explaining that the location history dashboard, that provides summaries of where you’ve been, has been discontinued…
4 Surprisingly Awesome Google Retail Opportunities for 2014
Google did a lot in 2013, but the retail opportunities and places the search giant could grow based on its current technology and resources are a bit mindboggling. Here are some areas where Google could potentially grow in 2014.
Digital Marketing Research Publications for week 1 2014
An overview of research published around the web around Digital Marketing topics. Week 1 of 2014.
Post from Bas van den Beld on State of Digital
Digital Marketing Research Publications for week 1 2014
What’s on your SEO wishlist for 2014?
From a SEO’s perspective, which of Google’s changes in 2013 have you least appreciated?
Julia Logan, Irish Wonder:
Where Google is going with the Knowledge base. It is simply becoming a scraper, and on top of that it cynically advises the website owners to produce more great content.
Yeah right, so Google has something to scrape.
Dr Pete Meyers, Marketing Scientist at Moz:
Again, [not provided]. Easily.
Andrew Girdwood, Media Innovations Director at LBi:
I dislike the 100% not provided and the communication around it. Google’s claims of ‘for privacy’ are too easily dismissed until you begin to speculate what other information Google might want to include in search results.
For a company that once claimed to want to help with the world’s information it seems a pleasant move would be to pass keyword data through their improved privacy.
It could investigate a redirect link with a keyword loaded query string on it, for example. Google has established, with its PPC policy, that keyword data is not a privacy breach.
Will Critchlow, Founder and CMO at Distilled:
For immediate impact, (not provided) is my least favourite change. Keywords aren’t everything by any means, but they are useful and the public explanations given are just so disingenuous.
If it really meant the explanation given about privacy, they not only wouldn’t be giving up paid keyword data, but also could have found a sensible middle ground of what to share instead of removing it all.
Directionally, I’m also very much not crazy about the UX changes to image search which seek actively to prevent searchers from visiting the sites that contain the images.
I see this as breaking the implied agreement whereby sites allow Google to crawl their sites in exchange for getting traffic when that crawl discovers a good result.

Richard Baxter, CEO at SEOGadget:
Well, I think Panda’s increasing aggressiveness has largely been ignored since Penguin came along. I’ll choose that update, but I actually appreciate it.
It’s an interesting update to work with – when you get really deep into technical work, particularly into the log files of affected sites you can really see why there’s a problem. The trick is to compare before and after.
What you find with log files is that they tend to confirm what most SEOs just say because they think it’s best practice. Very ‘thin’ pages with little unique content tend to encourage weird crawl behaviours.
For example, much less of the page (total size vs content downloaded) is downloaded by Googlebot than say, a content rich, really developed page. So, as much as I don’t appreciate my job being harder, I certainly appreciate it being more interesting!
What do you expect/hope to see in 2014?
Julia Logan:
I dream of a strong competitor rising so we all have some choice, as searchers, site owners and SEOs. This probably won’t happen very soon, maybe not in 2014, but can I dream?
Dr Pete Meyers:
I suspect a strong shift to a more card-based search result, akin to Google Now, Google+, and mobile search.
Google wants to mix and match information seamlessly, regardless of how you consume it. I believe we’ll see a Knowledge Graph expansion based on Google’s index – in other words, it’s going to extract ‘knowledge’ directly from websites more and more (and not just a small set of big databases).
I hope it’ll open some data back up and become more transparent, but I don’t expect it.

Kevin Gibbons, UK MD at Blueglass:
Bigger and better marketing campaigns. Less focus on tactics, and more integrated strategy across multi-channels.
We’ve certainly seen a shift ourselves towards a more consumer-led and customer centric strategy, looking to improve the overall user experience across multiple channels and devices.
Focusing much more on the bigger picture and being rewarded by Google as a result – as opposed to more tactical bursts of campaigns.
Andrew Girdwood:
Hope and expect are very different. I hope to see keyword data made better in Webmaster Console along with easier data extraction from the console. I doubt we’ll get that.
I expect to see more chat around Google+ and for Google to fuel that. I predict more SEO teams will spend more time talking about ‘signals’ rather than just ‘links’.
I fear we’ll see trouble when it comes to the difference between editorial and advertorial. The difference does not seem to be widely understood by very many bloggers and digital publishers.
Whether it’s in-house teams or SEO agencies doing the outreach doesn’t seem to matter but too many brands seem too happy either play to those misunderstandings or actively encourage them.
Will Critchlow:
I expect to see some innovative YouTube ad formats that could set it on the way to becoming a real brand-building platform for the web and see it claim a significant chunk of brand advertising spend.
[Coupled with this, I think we will see a subtle shift away from UGC and towards professional content on YouTube – it could become the equivalent of free-to-air TV versus Netflix’s cable equivalent].
I think Dr. Pete is spot on in his predictions of what we will see on the UI front.
I expect to see some live experimenting with more social ranking factors, particularly in the fresh results.
Teddie Cowell, Director of SEO, Mediacom:
I expect to see a lot happening around interaction, with search results appearing in more places where we haven’t previously seen them – think of the Android 4.4 Kit Kat contacts list as a current example of this.
I hope to see some controls mechanisms in place for Knowledge Graph. There have been a few to many factual inaccuracies; and some highly embarrassing ones, so currently it feels like Google is playing with fire in regards to what the Knowledge Graph says.
With particularly regard to brands, which by their nature as recognised entities are more likely to trigger the Knowledge Graph, it’s very dangerous territory, because coincidentally they are also some of Googles most valued advertisers.
Richard Baxter:
Spammy SEO to be gone. Google keep saying it’s getting better at tackling the bad stuff but there are still plenty of examples around – it’s a case of ‘do what you said you’d do’ – and not giving very poor quality SEO agencies any more fuel by way of case studies on their bad, temporary tactics.
It would make it much easier to get the message across that the good guys do a good job and that SEO is a credible, technical and content marketing discipline that is very much here to stay.
Jimmy McCann, Head of SEO at Search Laboratory:
Improved accuracy in the Webmaster Tools link examples that are given under manual action. These have been automated and incorrect in the past – which is a pain.
It would be better if the examples were more explicit and told you exactly what was required to sort out the penalty.
Adam Skalak, Head of SEO at iCrossing:
The most significant shift for SEO is that we are no longer limited by keyword phrases. Google’s 2014 expansion of its semantic-search offering, the Knowledge Graph, offers both opportunities and challenges for brands.
Established brands will benefit from greater exposure in more prominent parts of the results pages. But with Google providing answers directly at the top of the page, brands may struggle to increase their organic traffic as this could remove the need for people to click through to their site at all if they don’t need too much detail.
What Should I Put on the Homepage? – Whiteboard Friday
Posted by randfish
Homepages were once the ultra-authoritative one-stop shops of online brands. As people and search engines have become better at understanding what users are looking for, though, the purpose of homepages has become more targeted. In today’s Whiteboard Friday, Rand details several of the changes we’ve seen, and offers his advice for what to include on a truly effective homepage on the web today.
What Should I Put on the Homepage? – Whiteboard Friday
For reference, here’s a still of this week’s whiteboard!

Video transcription
Howdy Moz fans, and welcome to a new edition of Whiteboard Friday, the very first one of 2014. Hope you all had a wonderful happy New Year and a great holiday season, whatever you might celebrate.
This week, I think since January’s the time when a lot of us revisit our core web marketing and a lot of the times what we’re doing on our websites, we should talk about the starting point—the homepage. The homepage is a critically important page for a lot of reasons. Oftentimes it’s one of, if not the most, trafficked web page that we have on our websites. It’s also the starting point for where people try and understand our brand and our company and what we do.
Substantively, its role has changed over the last few years with big shifts like search engines being a little less focused around who gets links and how that influences the keywords that you rank for, a little less about the homepage being the only page that people land on, and whether they’re coming just to the homepage, or whether they go into separate sections of the site. What people want and expect from homepages has changed over the years, what they expect to find there, and, thus, what we as marketers need to do to deliver on those expectations.
So I thought I’d start by talking about some of the old ways of doing things with homepages and the new ways of doing them.
In the old way, we’d promote all of the major sections of the site on the homepage. So you might have a homepage that’s like, “Oh, check out our blog, and here’s our product, and here’s this other thing that we’re doing. Oh and this new launch point.” Each of these get featured, or they kind of scroll through them. It’s really the homepage very much competing for attention. You can think of that Yahoo! homepage model being the discovery point for everything on the site. If you don’t get homepage real estate, well, you’re not important.
This is totally wrong in 2014, because really we can make all of those major sections easy to navigate to and find. We can focus very uniquely on just one section, on just the most important things that the most important customers and visitors are trying to get answers to and what they expect when they get to that homepage.
We don’t need to say like, “Hey, I have this great feature and this other thing. Oh, we just launched this content. Let me promote everything, and I’ll just try and capture a small bit of everyone’s attention.” This focus is not nearly as good as trying to be a little bit more of a, “Here’s how to navigate to these sections. Let me just promote the most important thing and make that homepage more of a focused experience.”
We’ve seen tons and tons of examples of folks A/B testing and testing different versions of their homepage, and that focus, really, really critical to driving people through.
Old way: focus on lots of keywords. A lot of homepages would focus on a lot different keywords. The reason being—it’s not that hard to understand—the homepage, in the classic old, old Google, it would be your highest PageRank page and, therefore, could rank the most things. Then, as Google got more sophisticated and less about just PageRank, it was also the page that earned the most links. Often, the anchor text was fairly diversified that would link to that homepage, and so were all these other signals. So the homepage could rank for a lot of stuff that other pages couldn’t. So, “You know what? Let’s just smack all the keywords that we possibly can onto the homepage.”
In the current model, we actually don’t need to do that, because Google and Bing have both become much more sophisticated about understanding, “Hey, this site is about all of these things, not necessarily just this page. We’re much more considerate as engines of the site’s authority in different areas and around keyword terms and phrases. So, if that site has a page that specifically focuses on these topics, you know what? We’re going push that up there, even if the page itself doesn’t have all the signals that it needs to rank, because the site does.”
You inherit your site’s strength and authority into your internal pages. Because of that, I can now focus on a small subset of keywords on my homepage, possibly only one or two, possibly not even any keywords. I can just think about branded-centric keywords, not even unbranded keywords, and I can really have landing pages specific to those unbranded keywords deeper down in the sections.
This also means that you don’t have to make the focus of the homepage so all over the place. You can get it much more refined and defined to focus on that specific set of people who are coming directly there.
Because of this, too, the old style was to put lots of text to help the homepage rank for all those pages. Now, we don’t need that, but we really do need to communicate quickly, because web users have become more and more impatient. They’re not going to read through paragraph and paragraph and paragraph of text. Therefore, many, many websites have found it valuable to use visual-centric homepages to help communicate and to quickly convey the primary value proposition to those visitors. Sometimes that’s a video. Sometimes it’s just an image or graphic that explains things really clearly. That can work out great.
We also used to have to serve many types of visitors. This was both for SEO reasons, but also because people would come for lots of different reasons and then expect the homepage to guide them to whatever is interesting. Now, people use search engines to find those different things around your brand and then navigate directly to them. Social media is really about referring to specific pieces of content, not just the homepage. Not like, “Hey, the Economist wrote a great article. Go to TheEconomist.com” No, they’re going to send you a link right to the correct page. So you have a little bit more of that focus. You can just work on the most critical visitors and their needs and the messaging that you need to convey to them.
There also used to be this real concept of, “Keep it above the fold.”
Thanks to things like tablets and phones, as well as wider screens and that sort of stuff, now we do a lot more scrolling. We’re used to a lot more scrolling. So really people will scroll. I still urge folks to just make sure you keep some page content at the scroll line or near the traditional scroll lines, depending on your visitors’ resolution. Keep that experience compelling to draw the eye down. The thing you don’t want to do — I’ll show you in my sample homepage here—the thing I don’t want to do is have the scroll line or the fold line, one of the big traditional fold lines for my primary visitors, be right here, so that it looks like I can get all the content I need above the fold, but in fact there’s all this above the fold. If the scroll line instead is right here, and it bisects this secondary text section, perfect. Now I’ve drawn the eye down. Now people certainly will scroll, and that stuff will have visibility. You’ll have that expectation.
So, speaking of this sample homepage, I’m going to talk about some things that I, personally, would nudge folks and generally nudge folks to do on their homepages. This is not to say that every single company should go with exactly this type of homepage, but I think that these nudges can help to order your thinking and to possibly give you some ideas about things you might be doing right or wrong on your site, might want to test, might want to talk about as you’re kicking off 2014 with your homepage.
So first up, (A), right up top here, the logo and the nav. This is just standard 101 stuff. My general bias is to keep this the same logo and nav as other pages. However, the homepage is unique in that it’s sometimes okay to be a little different from other pages on the site. I would urge you to have consistency across the rest of the site. If your homepage has to be a little bit varied because of some things you want to do, that’s okay. But I like that nav staying consistent throughout the whole site. That’s my general bias.
(B) Check out this image. I’m going to imagine that I’m Pocket, Pocket app, which I have on my phone and I use on my desktop and laptop computers. It’s a great little app. The idea is that I’ve got an article that I want to read, maybe on a plane, and I want to read it on my phone. But, of course, I don’t have a wi-fi signal on especially international flights, but even most of my US flights. Or I want to read it just anytime. I’m sitting in the car on a long drive down to Portland. Great. So I can click and save any article, any web page I see on the Internet, I can save that to Pocket and go fetch it for later, and it automatically caches. So I don’t even need a web connection to be able to do that. I love Pocket app. It’s great.
But explaining it with a bunch of heavy text and having like “read things later” and lots of different keywords stuff, that probably doesn’t make sense. What does make sense is, “Let me quickly and easily explain it to you.” So here’s a guy, he’s on his phone, and here’s his thought bubble saying, “This is cool, but I wish I could read it later.” Oh. “Go to Pocket, and now you can. Read anytime on any device without a web connection.” Ah-ha! The value proposition of Pocket app is instantly conveyed in a visual format, which, as we all know, human beings are much better at taking visual cues and interpreting information from visuals rather than text alone.
So that’s (B). Visually explain, make it visual, to easily explain what the product, company, service does. I want that visual. I would urge you to test a visual to easily explain what that does. Show it to a bunch of people who have no idea what you do. If they grasp it, great.
If you offer lots of products, make sure to convey the value proposition of what you do. If you’re a clothing brand and you offer lots of different things, “Well, which picture should we use?” Well, quickly convey what your unique value proposition is. What it is about your clothing line that’s so great, that’s so much better? Is it where it’s made and that it’s hand crafted? Is it the quality of the material? Is it price? Is it something else? Make sure that you’re delivering that unique value proposition. So I’ve got this (C) section. Does it work for XYZ? Like, “Well, can I use this on my Android? Can I use it on my iPhone? Will it also work on desktop?” Ah-ha! Excellent. I’m going to be empathetic and intuitive. Oftentimes this comes from experience. You know the things that, as soon as someone hears about your product, they instantly have these questions. So just answer them right there. I really like that section existing on the homepage. Then you can go into more detail in product pages as well.
(D) I like giving social proof. So lots of websites do this on their homepage—showing the logo of news outlets that have covered them or big brands that use them that are very trustworthy or testimonials. I personally have found a lot of value in testimonials. I like them quite a bit, especially when they’re people who your audience knows who that person is. So you see an Avinash Kaushik or a Wil Reynolds or a Will Critchlow recommending Moz, you kind of go, “Well, I know who those guys are. They’re very impressive, well-known web marketers from across the industry. Let me check that out. That must be good.” So that’s social proof credibility signals.
And the last thing that I really like having on your homepage is a call to action. Last, but certainly not least, a call to action. “How do I install this?” “Well, you do this, you do this, or you do this.” So, for Pocket app, it might be, “If you have an Android, go to the Google Play Store. If you have Apple, go to the iPhone store. Want to use it on your desktop? Install the widget right here.” Great. Cool, right? There’s my call to action just sitting there, ready for me to go and do something. I think guiding someone to that next step is a key part of how successful a homepage operates. Then you can really test the success of your homepage as well, based on whether people engage and go there.
So I hope you’ve got some great ideas for your homepages in 2014. I look forward to hearing from you all. Thanks so much.
Video transcription by Speechpad.com
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!
SearchCap: The Day In Search, January 2, 2014
Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web. From Search Engine Land: Search Engine Land’s Most-Shared Stories on Google+ for 2013: What’s Right, What’s Wrong, What’s Next, & What’s Dead Happy New…
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
Mastering PPC: How Did You Come Up With My Budget?
What a coincidence that we both have the same New Year’s resolution for 2014: to crush it with PPC advertising. To do that, we determined a budget to pay for our PPC efforts. Management may ask – how did you decide on the budget amount? Luckily, Google and Bing have tools that provide cost estimates. […]