Key Metrics For Success With A Local Business Website

There’s a lot of literature out there discussing what local businesses can do to improve their websites, ranging from boosting search visibility through targeted keywords to leveraging content like video to keep visitors engaged. But what’s often missing from these conversations are broader…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

New Google Places For Business Listings Can Now Be Transferred to a New Owner via G+ Page Management

Update: 12:30: I have changed the title of the article from saying “Account” to “Listings” as what is being transferred is the G+ Page ownership NOT the account. I learned the hard way this past week that a business listing in the new Google Places for Business Dashboard that has been upgraded to social functionality, […]

How Search Engines Work — Really!

For those of us in SEO (or aspiring to be), there are a lot of little details that fill our days. Server architecture, 301 redirects, 404 errors, title tags, and various other things. Sometimes, we forget to sit back and figure out what it all means. A…

How to Avoid the Soon to be Guest Blogging Penalty

expanding reachHave you been using guest blogging to build your online presence? If you are into guest blogging, then this post is for you.

Guest blogging is a helpful way to be in front of other people’s audience. Or should I say, the other bloggers’ audience. It can help you reach your target readers, and it’s also a very powerful platform to share and demonstrate your expertise.

The post How to Avoid the Soon to be Guest Blogging Penalty appeared first on Kaiserthesage.

Design Thinking

One of the problems with analysing data is the potential to get trapped in the past, when we could be imagining the future. Past performance can be no indication of future success, especially when it comes to Google’s shifting whims.

We see problems, we devise a solution. But projecting forward by measuring the past, and coming up with “the best solution” may lead to missing some obvious opportunities.

Design Thinking

In 1972, psychologist, architect and design researcher Bryan Lawson created an empirical study to understand the difference between problem-based solvers and solution-based solvers. He took two groups of students – final year students in architecture and post-graduate science students – and asked them to create one-story structures from a set of colored blocks. The perimeter of the building was to optimize either the red or the blue color, however, there were unspecified rules governing the placement and relationship of some of the blocks.
Lawson found that:

The scientists adopted a technique of trying out a series of designs which used as many different blocks and combinations of blocks as possible as quickly as possible. Thus they tried to maximize the information available to them about the allowed combinations. If they could discover the rule governing which combinations of blocks were allowed they could then search for an arrangement which would optimize the required color around the design. By contrast, the architects selected their blocks in order to achieve the appropriately colored perimeter. If this proved not to be an acceptable combination, then the next most favorably colored block combination would be substituted and so on until an acceptable solution was discovered.

Nigel Cross concludes from Lawson’s studies that “scientific problem solving is done by analysis, while designers problem solve through synthesis”

Design thinking tends to start with the solution, rather than the problem. A lot of problem based-thinking focuses on finding the one correct solution to a problem, whereas design thinking tends to offer a variety of solutions around a common theme. It’s a different mindset.

One of the criticisms of Google, made by Google’s former design leader Douglas Bowman, was that Google were too data centric in their decision making:

When a company is filled with engineers, it turns to engineering to solve problems. Reduce each decision to a simple logic problem. Remove all subjectivity and just look at the data…that data eventually becomes a crutch for every decision, paralyzing the company and preventing it from making any daring design decisions…

There’s nothing wrong with being data-driven, of course. It’s essential. However, if companies only think in those terms, then they may be missing opportunities. If we imagine “what could be”, rather than looking at “what was”, opportunities present themselves. Google realise this, too, which is why they have Google X, a division devoted to imagining the future.

What search terms might people use that don’t necessarily show up on keyword mining tools? What search terms will people use six months from now in our vertical? Will customers contact us more often if we target them this way, rather than that way? Does our copy connect with our customers, of just search engines? Given Google is withholding more search referral data, which is making it harder to target keywords, adding some design thinking to the mix, if you don’t already, might prove useful.

Tools For Design Thinking

In the book, Designing For Growth, authors Jeanne Liedtka and Tim Ogilvie outline some tools for thinking about opportunities and business in ways that aren’t data-driven. One famous proponent of the intuitive, design-led approach was, of course, Steve Jobs.

It’s really hard to design products by focus groups. A lot of times, people don’t know what they want until you show it to them

The iphone or iPad couldn’t have been designed by looking solely at the past. They mostly came about because Jobs had an innate understanding of what people wanted. He was proven right by the resulting sales volume.

Design starts with empathy. It forces you to put yourself in the customers shoes. It means identifying real people with real problems.

In order to do this, we need to put past data aside and watch people, listen to people, and talk with people. The simple act of doing this is a rich source of keyword and business ideas because people often frame a problem in ways you may not expect.

For example, a lot of people see stopping smoking as a goal-setting issue, like a fitness regime, rather than a medical issue. Advertising copy based around medical terminology and keywords might not work as well as copy oriented around goal setting and achieving physical fitness. This shift in the frame of reference certainly conjures up an entirely different world of ad copy, and possibly keywords, too. That different frame might be difficult to determine from analytics and keyword trends alone, but might be relatively easy to spot simply by talking to potential customers.

Four Questions

Designing For Growth is worth a read if you’re feeling bogged down in data and looking for new ways to tackle problems and develop new opportunities. I don’t think there’s anything particularly new in it, and it can come across as “the shiny new buzzword” at times, but the fundamental ideas are strong. I think there is value in applying some of these ideas directly to current SEO issues.

Designing For Growth recommends asking the following questions.

What is?

What is the current reality? What is the problem your customers are trying to solve? Xerox solved a problem customers didn’t even know that had when Xerox invented the fax machine. Same goes for the Polaroid camera. And the microwave oven. Customers probably couldn’t describe those things until they saw and understood them, but the problem would have been evident had someone looked closely at the problems they faced i.e. people really wanted faster, easier ways of completing common tasks.

What do your customers most dislike about the current state of affairs? About your industry? How often do you ask them?

One way of representing this information is with a flowchart. Map the current user experience from when they have a problem, to imagining keywords, to searching, to seeing the results, to clicking on one of those results, to finding your site, interacting to your site, to taking desired action. Could any of the results or steps be better?

Usability tests use the same method. It’s good to watch actual customers as they do this, if possible. Conduct a few interviews. Ask questions. Listen to the language people use. We can glean some of this information from data mining, but there’s a lot more we can get by direct observation, especially when people don’t click on something, as non-activity seldom registers in a meaningful way in analytics.

What if?

What would “something better” look like?

Rather than think in terms of what is practical and the constraints that might prevent you from doing something, imagine what an ideal solution would look like if it weren’t for those practicalities and constraints.

Perhaps draw pictures. Make mock-ups. Tell a story. Anything that fires the imagination. Use emotion. Intuition. Feeling. Just going through such a process will lead to making connections that are difficult to make by staring at a spreadsheet.

A lot of usability testers create personas. These are fictional characters based on real or potential customers and are used try to gain an understanding of what they might search for, what problems they are trying to solve, and what they expect to see on our site. Is this persona a busy person? Well educated? Do they use the internet a lot? Are they buying for themselves, or on behalf of others? Do they tend to react emotionally, or are they logical? What incentives would this persona respond to?

Personas tend to work best when they’re based on actual people. Watch and observe. Read up on relevant case studies. Trawl back through your emails from customers. Make use of story-boards to capture their potential actions and thoughts. Stories are great ways to understand motivations and thoughts.

What are those things your competition does, and how could they be better? What would those things look like in the best possible world, a world free of constraints?

What wows?

“What wows” is especially important for social media and SEO going forward.

Consider Matt Cutts statement about frogs:

Those other sites are not bringing additional value. While they’re not duplicates they bring nothing new to the table. It’s not that there’s anything wrong with what these people have done, but they should not expect this type of content to rank.
Google would seek to detect that there is no real differentiation between these results and show only one of them so we could offer users different types of sites in the other search results

Cutts talks about the creation of new value. If one site is saying pretty much the same as another site, then those sites may not be duplicates, but one is not adding much in the way of value, either. The new site may be relegated simply for being “too samey”.

It’s the opposite of the Zygna path:

“I don’t fucking want innovation,” an anonymous ex-employee recalls Pincus saying in 2010, according to the SF Weekly. “You’re not smarter than your competitor. Just copy what they do and do it until you get their numbers.”

Generally speaking, up-and-coming sites should focus on wowing their audience with added depth and/or a new perspective. This, in turn, means having something worth remarking upon, which then attracts mentions across social media, and generates more links.

Is this certain to happen? Nothing is certain as far as Google is concerned. They could still bury you on a whim, but wowing an audience is a better bet than simply imitating long-established players using similar content and link structures. At some point, those long-established players had to wow their audience to get the attention and rankings they enjoy today. They did something remarkably different at some point. Instead of digging the same hole deeper, dig a new hole.

In SEO, change tends to be experimental. It’s iterative. We’re not quite sure what works ahead of time, and no amount of measuring the past tells us all we want to know, but we try a few things and see what works. If a site is not ranking well, we try something else, until it does.

Which leads us to….

What works?

Do searchers go for it? Do they do that thing we want them to do, which is click on an ad, or sign up, or buy something?

SEOs are pretty accomplished at this step. Experimentation in areas that are difficult to quantify – the algorithms – have been an intrinsic part of SEO.

The tricky part is not all things work the same everywhere & much like modern health pathologies, Google has clever delays in their algorithms:

Many modern public health pathologies – obesity, substance abuse, smoking – share a common trait: the people affected by them are failing to manage something whose cause and effect are separated by a huge amount of time and space. If every drag on a cigarette brought up a tumour, it would be much harder to start smoking and much easier to quit.

One site’s rankings are more stable because another person can’t get around the sandbox or their links get them penalized. The same strategy and those same links might work great for another site.

Changes in user behavior are more directly & immediately measurable than SEO.

Consider using change experiments as an opportunity to open up a conversation with potential users. “Do you like our changes? Tell us”. Perhaps use a prompt asking people to initiate a chat, or participate on a poll. Engagement that has many benefits. It will likely prevent a fast click back, you get to see the words people use and how they frame their problems, and you learn more about them. You become more responsive and empathetic sympathetic to their needs.

Beyond Design Thinking

There’s more detail to design thinking, but, really, it’s mostly just common sense. Another framework to add, especially if you feel you’re getting stuck in faceless data.

Design thinking is not a panacea. It is a process, just as Six Sigma is a process. Both have their place in the modern enterprise. The quest for efficiency hasn’t gone away and in fact, in our economically straitened times, it’s sensible to search for ever more rigorous savings anywhere you can

What’s best about it, I feel, is this type of thinking helps break strategy and data problems down and give it a human face.

In this world, designers can continue to create extraordinary value. They are the people who have, or could have, the laterality needed to solve problems, the sensing skills needed to hear what the world wants, and the databases required to build for the long haul and the big trajectories. Designers can be definers, making the world more intelligible, more habitable

Categories: 

Social Media Celebrities and Why They are the Best Digital Marketers

Why do some social media users become internet celebrities and what can digital marketers learn from? Sarah Bradley looks into a few of her favourite social networkers and explains why they make some of the best digital marketers.

Post from on State of Digital
Social Media Celebrities and Why They are the Best Digital Marketers

Social Media Celebrities and Why They are the Best Digital Marketers

professional fangirl 3Why do some social media users become internet celebrities and what can digital marketers learn from? Sarah Bradley looks into a few of her favourite social networkers and explains why they make some of the best digital marketers.

Post from on State of Search
Social Media Celebrities and Why They are the Best Digital Marketers

Helpouts – Notes, T’s & C’s: Will Google Keep it Family Friendly? Will They Succeed as the New Hall Monitors?

Helpouts offers up the possibility of an incredible new platform for SMBS to share their knowledge and skills and a new way of marketing those via a Google Helpout Marketplace. Signing up is a snap. It also offers up an appealing platform for spammers and scammers and con artists. Will Google succeed in keeping it family friendly […]

Avoiding Disaster: How to Prevent the 3 Most Common Content Marketing #Fails

Posted by Adria.Saracino

During my SearchLove San Diego presentation last week, I talked about “Why Your Content Marketing Initiatives are Failing (And How to Fix Them).” I highlighted eight ways content marketing programs can fail or suffer, along with ways to prevent or overcome these various obstacles.

I separated my presentation into three distinct “sections” of failure: tactical, strategic, and internal. While all sections and associated #fails are important to address, strategic failures are the ones that tend to affect the other two. For example, if the strategy is off, then how you tactically execute your content and campaigns will suffer. Likewise, if you can’t prove your “strategic game,” you won’t get the internal buy-in required to set up an optimal content marketing program.

Thus, strategic is the area you really want to focus on when optimizing your content marketing initiatives. While there are many ways you can up your strategic game, there are three biggies. I’ll go through each of these in more depth than my presentation allowed, and provide resources for additional reading throughout.

First way to fail: Confusing content marketing with link building

Let me just say it: Content marketing is not synonymous with link building. We shouldn’t make content only to address those “viral” topics in hopes of “winning the internet” and attracting a lot of links and social shares to our brand. While this could help spread brand awareness and attract potential customers, if we’re not using content to address users’ wants and needs throughout their purchasing paths, we’re just attracting more eyeballs but then not knowing what to do with them once they are on us.

The fix: Know where link building fits into the full promotional landscape

Content marketing isn’t only a tool for spreading brand awareness. Rather, it is a philosophy that should touch every part of your website and offline marketing initiatives. Since content—written, visual, you name it—is a part of just about every marketing channel, we need to start treating content marketing not as its own separate silo, but as an integrated part of all the marketing opportunities we have available to us.

So, what does this mean? It means we need to understand what type of content is required in order to get our customers to convert and become brand loyalists.

Let’s look at two different scenarios. Say Brand A is amazing at creating that “viral content for link building,” but doesn’t have very informative or user-friendly content on the rest of its site. Brand A probably isn’t going to see an increase in sales because it is losing customer interest or trust by not helping them throughout the purchasing journey with its content.

On the flip side, say Brand B creates “viral” content and uses that opportunity to lead those visitors to more useful content further down the funnel with strong calls to action. Brand B is more likely to see its content marketing initiatives leading to sales because it’s holding customers’ hands throughout the purchasing journey.

If you want to be like Brand B, you need to stop looking at content marketing as only a brand-awareness tactic. Link building is fundamentally a brand awareness tactic because we’re getting coverage on third-party sites, oftentimes on ones whose editors never heard of our brand before. To illustrate where link building fits into the promotional landscape, I’ve created the below image that matches the different types of promotion we can do to the funnel. Note, I’ve included link building under the umbrella of outreach, as while outreach doesn’t only include link building, this is where that tactic typically falls.

As you can see, PR and outreach/link building functions are only suited for content that addresses the mid/top and the very bottom of the purchasing funnel. If you’ve ever done any outreach, you know the hardships that come along with trying to build links to content that is very brand or conversion focused, such as e-commerce product pages. The reason it’s hard is because publishers do not care about your brand unless you’re willing to pay for the coverage—hence why advertising is such a great promotional tool for content throughout most of the funnel.

Now, you might be questioning why some of the other promotional activities sit where they do on the funnel in the above graphic. Please note that you can find ways to use these promotional activities for content in other areas of the funnel, depending on the content topic and exact angle. However, in my experience this is where each promotional function should be in order to see the best results.

The main takeaway here is that you want to match what stage of the funnel your content is addressing to the appropriate promotional activity in order to see the best returns. So, don’t try and force link building as the main promotional tactic for all your content because chances are you’ll meet a lot of publisher resistance to content addressing those other areas of the funnel. You do not need to host a mind-blowing promotional campaign for every piece of content you create, so stop chugging money down the drain. It’s not about promoting harder, but rather promoting smarter.

Second way to fail: No, or improper, goal alignment and tracking

There are two scenarios here. First, many companies churn out content and dub it “content marketing” without any real goals mapped out. I see this a lot with blog content, where companies decide they need to have a blog and just start churning out articles that they think are cool, not really looking at the results to determine if it’s making the business money.

The second scenario is only tracking short-term goals. I see this a lot among companies that confuse content marketing with link building (as noted above). These companies often have one goal in mind: quantifying if it went viral or not. This includes monitoring metrics like links, social shares, and mentions.

However, these metrics are only the first step to making money. Rarely do links placed result in direct sales, particularly with top-of-the-funnel content. Thus, these companies aren’t aligning their content marketing initiatives to the appropriate goals.

The fix: Know the different types of goals and metrics for tracking

All [content] marketing goals and their subsequent tracking metrics can be compiled into four buckets. These buckets quite nicely match with the different stages of the customer purchasing funnel.

For content covering top-of-the-funnel topics, we often measure consumption metrics to better understand if those topics are “sticky” to our target audience(s) and indeed spreading brand awareness. Once we get into heavy search and consideration content, we start trying to find ways to turn those visitors consuming our content into leads. From there, we hope that it turns into a sale, and then we hope to retain them.

What I don’t like about the above visual though, is that while it helps map goals to the funnel, it seems to have a very definitive start and end point. Really, you want to figure out how to make your goals cyclical. Thus, I like the below visualization of these buckets a bit better.

A cycle is a better visualization, because think about it: we’re hoping to get our audience to consume our content, which we hope will lead them to a sale. Once they finish with their purchase, we hope to retain them as loyal customers, who will then ideally become repeat consumers and buyers (hopefully bringing new customers along the ride with them via word of mouth and brand advocacy!).

In the above visualization, I put a red box around the consumption metrics because unfortunately our industry tends to concentrate only on these short-term measurements. Yes, new customer acquisition is important to growth; but a lot of us ignore the opportunity to increase revenue by investing in community and retention building. In order to realize our full content marketing potential, we need to start mapping our content to goals throughout the cycle, using the above KPIs to ensure they are actually measurable.

Third way to fail: Not doing the research required to devise a strategy

I get this question a lot: “What’s the difference between content marketing and content strategy.” This is how I look at it. Content marketing is an umbrella term to describe any marketing function that includes content (see why I think it’s so integrated with other channels? Pretty much everything includes content!). Content strategy is one of the threads (along with your brand message and editorial standards) that weaves your content marketing initiatives together and aims them at a specific end goal.

To say it bluntly, having a content strategy is essential to running a successful content marketing program. If there is no strategy, it could result in a bunch of inconsistent pieces of content that aren’t all working in unison toward the same end goal. Inconsistency is the kiss of death in marketing, because without consistency you can easily lose customers’ trust. And who gives their credit cards to a brand they don’t trust?

And when I say “strategy,” I don’t mean just making a wild claim and saying, “This is our strategy.” Rather, I mean developing a strategy that has the most likely chance of success; one that is the least risky to pursue (or that is a calculated risk). How do you come up with an actual strategy that takes risk and forecasting into account? You need to start with research.

The fix: Do THIS type of research

This is the process I use here at Distilled when a client comes to us and says he/she wants a content strategy. It can be broken down into four distinct chunks of research, demonstrated in the visual below.

I’ll go into more detail about each of those research components below. Once the research is complete (we’re talking, ideally, 2-3 months out), all of it can by synthesized to produce a content strategy.

However, remember when I said the strategy is just one of three threads needed to direct your content outputs? You also need to ensure you have a sticky brand message (this can be for internal use only or both internal and external use) and editorial standards. Before creating any content, you’ll need to filter your strategy through these other threads in order to ensure consistency.

Benchmark audit

Essentially, this is doing the research necessary to really understand your brand and current performance.

You want to answer the following four questions:

  1. How are we currently performing?
  2. Where are we underperforming/where are the opportunities for improvement?
  3. Are we measuring the right things? (i.e. is tracking and measurement set up correctly?)
  4. What is our USP?

To answer these four questions, below are the actions to take to get a clear understanding of your product/service and current performance.

Look in Google Analytics: A good place to start is Google Analytics. Here you’ll be able to look at the company’s online performance over (at minimum) the past year. The areas you’ll want to explore include:

  • What is traffic like? Any seasonality?
  • Unique vs. new visitors?
  • Any significant geographic info?
  • What pages were visited most?
  • What is the typical visitor flow? Can we aggregate typical paths?
  • What are considered conversions? Are goals set up?
  • What pages get the most conversions?
  • How did conversions perform last year? (Also, how much money did we make?)
  • Where did visitors spend the most time?
  • Bounce rates?
  • How long did visitors stay on the site?
  • How did visitors get to the site? Direct vs. referral vs. organic vs. paid?
  • What are the top referring URLs/sources and keywords?
  • What is the breakdown of non-branded vs. branded traffic like?
  • Any interesting mobile vs. web data?
  • Any significant traffic from social?
  • Top landing pages?

Do a technical audit: This is also the time to do (or redo) a technical audit. I’m not going to reinvent the wheel here with more info, considering my colleague Geoff Kenyon wrote this ginormous post a while back on how to do a technical audit and it’s ridiculously complete.

The only other portion I’d add to this is to make sure you’re paying attention to the site structure from not only a technical, but also a user perspective. You’ll want to make sure your IA is setup optimally for mass content production later on. Trust me; you don’t want to get into the business of creating a ton of content and pushing it live when your site structure is disorganized. Do the work to figure out how you should setup your site first so you don’t make mistakes of redirecting content later. Here are two resources I like a lot regarding setting up your IA for content and SEO success.

Conduct a content audit: Doing a content audit isn’t so difficult, it’s just a monster of a job because you’re weeding through a lot of web pages. There are a ton of different metrics you can gather about your content to do this. What I typically pull includes:

  • Landing page URLs
  • Status code
  • Page title
  • Word count
  • Pageviews
  • Unique page views
  • Time on page
  • Bounce rate
  • % Exit
  • # Entrances
  • Referral entrances
  • Organic entrances
  • Pages/visit
  • Overall goal completion
  • Breakdown of goal completions
  • CPA (if applicable)
  • # unique root linking domains
  • Page Authority/Domain authority
  • Social Metrics (# FB shares, tweet, likes, +1s, etc.)

Once all this data is pulled, I’ll go through the content assigning a quality score to each page and assigning it a stage in the funnel. Later on I’ll go back to find gaps in the quality and funnel stages being addressed by the content. While a content audit might not be the most fun thing you can do as a marketer, I’d argue it’s one of the most insightful. Oftentimes you find pieces to look into for your technical audit, so don’t skip this step. You need to know where you’ve been to know where you’re going with your content!

Note: ideally you’re pulling all pages on your site that have content. However, depending on your site this might be unreasonable, so you can break it down into chunks. For example, if you’re an online directory with millions of really thin pages, you can start pulling just your blog/resource center content. Know, though, that ideally you do a content audit of all your web content!

Benchmark current keyword rankings: While the value of keyword rankings is argued to be diminishing and changing, I like to look at this now to be able to pinpoint areas for more organic growth later on. Also, this can be a great tool for getting buy-in from superiors to do content marketing, particularly when you compare current rankings to those of competitors!

Make sure you know the company in and out: If you are an agency and this is a new client, you’ll also probably want to ask more general questions about the company in order to get a really clear sense of how it operates and makes money. These would include things like the following:

  • How does the brand earn customers and revenue?
  • What words/phrases would the company use to describe itself?
  • What can the company tell us about its customers?
  • Ask the company this, “What makes you different from your competitors?”
  • What is the company’s current brand message? (It’s a good idea to see if they [think they] have one!)
  • What are the different product/services it offers?
  • What is the company’s organizational structure?
  • Who else creates content for the website?
  • What does the current content development process look like?
  • Who will have sign-off on any work that we do?
  • What is the typical lead time for sign off?
  • Does the company have a PR/outreach team and/or social team, internally or externally?
  • What are the goals for this engagement?
  • How is our point of contact measured? What metrics does he/she report on?
  • Does the company have any technical or PR launches coming up? Can the company provide us a calendar for the rest of this year?
  • What other marketing initiatives does the company use to draw in new business?
  • Does the company have a newsletter? if so, how many subscribers? How active is it? How engaged are recipients? (you’ll want to know this for customer research later)
  • Is the company currently working with any other external agencies? If so, what do they work on?

Pro tip: One of my favorite things to do is to go through the sales process for my client’s company, pretending I am a customer. This process must include going through customer service. Another great idea would be to have your mom or dad go through the process and you can watch them. This could be effective if the client’s industry doesn’t cater to internet savvy marketers.

If you’re in-house and don’t necessarily need to go through as granular of a discovery period about your own company, check out this video on how you can mine your sales department for content marketing.

Competitor research

Competitor research is so important to making an informed content plan. There are a lot of really good resources out there on how to conduct competitor research, everything from the more traditional to an analysis viewed through a content marketing lens.

I won’t go into too much detail about how to conduct this, as it varies depending on your niche and also your level of investment (for example, that latter link suggests conducting a content audit on your competitors’ content—bloody brilliant, but time consuming!).

I definitely look at this through a content lens when I need to prioritize what to look for. Some questions I ask once I know what competitors I’m targeting include:

  • What products/services do they offer? How are they different from ours?
  • What are the competitors’ brand messages?
  • What are the competitors’ USPs? What makes them different?
  • What types of marketing are competitors doing (i.e. social, content, offline, etc.)?
  • How are they performing with these different marketing channels?
  • What type of content do they create?
  • How is this content performing?
  • Do they have a community? If so, how big and engaged is it?
  • What are they doing well? What could they be doing better?
  • How are competitors performing in SERPs?

Pro tip: One of my favorite things to do, like above, is go through the sales process for each competitor, and this process must include going through customer service.

Oh, and I really like Annie Cushing’s article on mining competitors’ backlinks.

(Online) market research

I put the “online” in parentheses because there are many more ways to do market research than just through the web, such as via focus groups or direct email surveys/census data. However, since we’re predominantly focused on search as an industry, I’ll highlight a few main areas to direct your attention.

Conduct keyword research throughout the funnel: Again, the tools available to do this are diminishing, but conducting keyword research allows you to understand users intent when they search for information. You’ll want to use your findings to prioritize your content initiatives later, most likely addressing the ripest opportunities for search domination first.

I’m not going to get into too much detail about how to conduct keyword research because there are a TON of articles out there already. However, I cannot stress enough how important getting creative and conducting keyword research for opportunities throughout a customers’ potential purchasing path is. Don’t just focus on those conversion-focused head terms. Think bigger and further removed from the purchase.

Check out Google Trends: Mike Tekula wrote a great post on underappreciated marketing resources from Google, most of which can be applied to this market research phase. One of my favorites from that list is Google Trends. You can use it to look up the historical search volume estimates for different keywords, which gives you a much clearer picture on popularity than just doing research for a single point in time. Plus, it results in pretty graphs that you can use to get buy-in later on.

Find out what’s trending socially: Mining data from social media is a great way to get a sense of what the interweb peoples find interesting. I really like this article from Marketing Sherpa via last year about how to mine Twitter for actionable data. What social platform is right for you to mine depends on your industry and where your customers hang out. Here is a list of 69 social media tools you can use for getting a better grasp on what goes over well socially.

Customer research

The last, and I’d argue most important part of this research process is the customer research portion. I wrote an article on Search Engine Watch on ways to develop customer personas, and honestly, there are even more ways than that. This is one area of research that I encourage you to keep thinking about and keep evolving, because there’s so many creative ways to do this. Here are some of the ideas and approaches I’ve been playing around with, some of which I’ve tried, others I haven’t yet:

  • Surveys: You can send this both to your current customers and to non-customers using tools like Google Consumer Surveys. You can even survey users directly on your site using tools like Qualaroo.
  • Interviews and focus groups: Yes, this is probably one of my favorites because I’ve found it the most useful. More on this below.
  • Real-people studies: Okay, that’s a really crappy group description, but essentially what I mean here is using available tools to allow non-customers to test out different portions of your site and give feedback. You can use things like Mechanical Turk, UserTesting.com, Feedback Army, and Crazy Egg.
  • Scrape live chat logs or talk to your customer service department. You can also scrape FAQs (or just research them if you don’t have an expansive FAQ platform on your site).
  • Scrape forums or communities like Quora or LinkedIn groups to get a sense of what questions are being asked related to your product/services and/or industry.
  • Use big-data APIs to mine social insights from your users: I love this article about how to mine FullContact to get a better understanding of your customers.

Since our industry is made up of very technical people, I won’t get into the nitty gritty of how to execute some of the more quantitative approaches above. What I will dive a bit deeper into is the qualitative approaches, such as surveys, interviews, and focus groups.

First, you need to know that usually you cannot directly ask the questions to get the information you really need to know about your customers. What you’re really trying to figure out is the following:

  • What is their typical role(s) in the decision making process? (Initiator > influencer > decision maker > buyer > user > gatekeeper)
  • What does their typical purchasing journey looks like?
  • How much content, and what type, do they consume at different stages?
  • What factors drive their purchasing decisions?
  • Who influences their purchasing decisions?
  • What are their most common objections to the company and/or its product/services?
  • How quickly do they make decisions?

You can probably see why you can’t ask these directly—the truth and what a customer will tell you are two different things! I find that survey questions vary widely depending on the industry, thus, I won’t go into too much detail on the surveys but rather focus on the questions I like to ask during in-person interviews.

However, before I jump into this, I will say a few things about surveys. First, I use customer surveys as a way to source people for interviews. I typically give an incentive for filling out the survey (like being entered to win a $75 gift card). However, I’ll also give a guaranteed incentive for those who volunteer to do an interview (saying things like “if you do an interview, I’ll give you an automatic $25 gift card). I find this works like a charm, and is super valuable in being able to narrow down exactly who you interview.

This comes to my second point with interviews. You want to make sure you get the quantitative demographic information out of the way during the survey vs. during the interview. For B2B, you definitely want to ask job titles so that you can ensure you interview at least one person from each of the roles in the decision making process. You can also ask Net Promoter Score questions in surveys (i.e. “how likely are you to recommend us”) to make sure you choose interviewees who both like and dislike your services. Remember, customer interviews aren’t just a time to get all the good info—you want the bad just as much (if not more)!

Okay, back to interviews. Here are the questions I typically like to ask. Some are more appropriate for B2B than B2C, and vice versus, but hopefully this gives you some ideas of questions to ask during your next interview.

B2B Specific Interview Questions:

  • Describe your role.
  • How is your job measured?
  • What does a typical day look like?
  • What skills are required to do your job?
  • What knowledge and tools do you use in your job?
  • Who do you report to? Who reports to you? How much autonomy do you have in decision-making processes?
  • What are you responsible for?
  • What does it mean to be successful in your role?
  • What do you like best about your role?
  • What do you like least about your role?
  • What are your biggest challenges at work?

B2C or B2B Interview Questions:

  • Why did you seek an INSERT PRODUCT/SERVICE solution < best for recent customer
  • What were some key factors you looked at to evaluate the different solutions available? < again for recent customers
  • Do you use the internet to research vendors or products? If yes, how do you search for information?
  • Describe a recent purchase
    • Why did you consider a purchase?
    • What was the evaluation process?
    • How did you decide to purchase that product or service?
    • Who signed off the purchase?
  • What do you like best about INSERT COMPANY?
  • What do you like least?
  • What do you like to do in your spare time? < want to get places they hang out on the web, both social media platforms and specific sites they frequent

If you need more ideas, here are some more thanks to Content Marketing Institute.

Once you have all of these components together, that is when you can start identifying a content strategy. You want this content strategy to go after opportunities for growth (based off your benchmark audit), gaps in the market (what aren’t your competitors doing that you can be?), and what your current or target customers want and need in order to make a purchasing decision. It’s not until you have all these vital research components that you can eloquently develop a data-driven strategy to achieve some amazing content marketing success.

Takeaways

While there are many ways your content marketing initiatives can fail, many of these reasons stem from these three strategic biggies:

  1. Confusing content marketing with link building, which affects the type of promotion you’ll do and the effectiveness of each campaign.
  2. Not aligning goals and tracking them correctly.
  3. Not conducting enough research in order to develop a cohesive, effective strategy for your forthcoming content outputs.

Sort these three parts out, and it’s likely that you’ll start seeing results from your content marketing initiatives. And you know what that means? You’ll then be able to use your results to tackle the more difficult content marketing woes, such as earning internal buy-in and changing your company culture into one that eats, sleeps, and breathes content.

I would love to hear in the comments what failures you’ve experienced during your various content marketing initiatives, and how you overcame them!

If you’re curious, there were a ton of great presentation’s at last week’s Distilled SearchLove San Diego, and there’s many more to come at the SearchLove London conference next month. If you’re interested in seeing my full presentation, you can play it below.

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!