Google Officially Launches Webmaster Tools International Targeting
Google has officially announced the new feature we reported was in beta named International Targeting. The new International Targeting reports within Google Webmaster Tools helps webmasters debug common issues with their implementation of href-lang. Th…
Social Media Marketing Gone Wrong
Social media can be an effective traffic driver when done well, but can truly alienate your customers when done badly, or when perceived to be done badly. Here are some major social media misfires, and how to avoid becoming the next social screw-up.
Ingress Finally On iOS Devices
As expected, Google has brought Ingress, Google’s near-real time augmented reality where you have to fractions trying to secure or take portals. Or something like that.
The game is now available for iOS users…
Google Shopping Ads With Price Grouping
Google is testing a new Google shopping ad layout, where they group the ads by pricing. For example, they may show ads of products for prices above a certain price and then below a certain price…
Google On Right To Be Forgotten: We Want To Hear From You.
Google has an advisory council specifically designed around the Right To Be Forgotten topic…
Google For Webmasters: It’s Only Going To Get Worse, Not Better
The SEO space is very negative these days, not many smiles unless you work at large brands. A WebmasterWorld thread has a common topic come up, the topic of us being corkscrews and how the answers will dominate and weed out the source of the content, …
Google Webmaster Tools International Targeting Now Available
In June, Google began privately beta testing a new feature, which we uncovered as a Webmaster Tools href lang debug tool…
Troubleshooting hreflang annotations in Webmaster Tools
-
Missing return links: annotations must be confirmed from the pages they are pointing to. If page A links to page B, page B must link back to page A, otherwise the annotations may not be interpreted correctly.
For each error of this kind we report where and when we detected them, as well as where the return link is expected to be.
-
Incorrect hreflang values: The value of the hreflang attribute must either be a language code in ISO 639-1 format such as “es”, or a combination of language and country code such as “es-AR”, where the country code is in ISO 3166-1 Alpha 2 format.
In case our indexing systems detect language or country codes that are not in these formats, we provide example URLs to help you fix them.
Posted by Gary Illyes, Webmaster Trends
Optimizing Across Paid & Organic Search: 3 Ways to Maximize Value
With more data available to help make smarter decisions, brands are being more strategic about when and where they overlap paid and organic efforts. Here are three things to think about for your brand as you optimize for paid and organic search.
Why CMOs should be looking out for Google penalties
The marketing world is in a bit of a transformation and has been in this ever evolving state for years. Most people know about this change and that it is moving very rapidly from the traditional style of marketing to the new digital rules.
Gone are the…
Understanding Customers Through Market Segmentation
To sell to your customer, you must know your customer. You cannot solve your customers’ needs if you do not know what they are. You cannot reach your customer and grab their attention if you do not know where to find them. You cannot engage with them with any type of marketing tactic unless you […]
The post Understanding Customers Through Market Segmentation appeared first on Builtvisible – A Creative Digital Agency.
SEOs Know Things about UX: Here’s How to Prove it
Posted by Kristina Kledzik
As a human being currently using the internet, you have opinions about online user experience. The problem is, everyone’s experience is going to be different based on their expectations. So although you, as a Moz blog reader and probably an internet connoisseur, may have some very good ideas about making your company’s or client’s site easier to use for the majority of visitors, there’s a good chance that your boss or client will disagree with you.
If you’re like me and aren’t a user experience expert, it’s going to be hard to argue with them on gut instinct alone. Rather than debate in circles, spend the time to validate your argument:
- Prove there is a problem. This is a good idea even if you and your boss (or client) wholeheartedly agree that the site is less than optimal. Get feedback from visitors who aren’t working on the site and see if their feedback lines up with your assumptions.
- Propose a solution. Based on the feedback, propose a solution. It’s best to do this visually with a page mockup.
- Test that solution. See how visitors respond better to your new design than they did to the old design.
By going through these steps, you can build a strong case for implementing your recommendations.
How to prove there is a problem
My favorite:
Qualaroo

Qualaroo is a simple yet effective way to collect feedback. You just put a small piece of JavaScript code on your site, allowing Qualaroo to load a question in the lower right hand corner of a page. You can:
- Place the question on any page or group of pages
- Write your own questions or use their helpful library of examples
- Set a time for when the box shows up (e.g., on page load, after 15 seconds, or when the visitor moves their cursor up to the URL bar on their browser, indicating they might leave)
Example use: One of my clients runs seminars. They can host them in a number of places, but if the seminar is hosted in their primary building, they don’t explicitly say where the seminar is held. I theorized that this is causing confusion for visitors and that adding the address to the seminar page would make visitors’ decisions easier.
I didn’t want to ask a leading question, though, so I just added a question to every seminar page, “Is there any other information you need to make a decision today?” Once I had collected a few hundred responses, I exported the feedback to an Excel file and started sorting ideas. I was right: a good proportion of people were interested in the location. The exercise also taught me that a lot of visitors wanted a sample schedule of the program.
Cons: You only hear from people who are on your site
Price: $79/month (less if you pay for 1 – 2 years at a time)
Cheap feedback without access to the code of your site:
Feedback Army/Mechanical Turk

While I recommend Qualaroo, I realize that many of you may not be able to convince your boss or client to install JavaScript and potentially distract visitors with your UX questions. If that’s the case, you can use
Mechanical Turk, or Feedback Army, which is a guy using Mechanical Turk for you, because mTurk’s interface is pretty clunky.
Mechanical Turk allows you to submit questions to millions of online workers from across the world (about 30% are American), so you can use the same questions as you would with Qualaroo. You have to lead them to the right page to review as well, but that should be easy enough.
Cons: Mechanical Turk doesn’t pay their testers a whole lot, so you’ll get very quick, off the cuff responses. Plus, they won’t be from your target audience or customer base.
Price: $40 per 10 responses
More expensive feedback without access to the code of your site:
UserTesting.com

If you’d like a more robust user experience test, try out
UserTesting.com. Testers are paid $35/test, so they’re going to give you a much more in-depth, thoughtful review than Mechanical Turk. With a higher price tag comes a lot more information, though: you give testers a task and ask them for feedback along the way. This may be excessive if your idea was about tweaking one piece of one page, but it’s great for information architecture/site navigation issues.
Cons: Reviewers are being paid well to test your site, here, so they want to do a thorough job, and I’ve heard they can be nitpicky.
Price: $49/tester (you’ll need a few, at least)
Bonus: Running tests like these without access to the code of the site means that you can run tests on your competitors, too! Use either Feedback Army or UserTesting.com to learn what people like about your competitors’ sites and what frustrates them. It’ll tell you what you’re up against, and pieces that testers praise may be worth imitating on your own site.
Quantitative feedback:
Google Analytics

Google Analytics won’t give you the opinions of visitors, but sometimes actions speak louder than words. If your theory is that:
- Calls to action aren’t really…calling people to action
- Visitors don’t know how to navigate to the page they’re looking for
- Readers don’t scroll all the way to the bottom of the page
Then you can look at:
- What proportion of visitors clicked on that call to action (if there are multiple CTAs to the same location on a page, you may have to set up Event Tracking to be sure which CTA was clicked)
- How visitors move through your site with the Visitor Flow report, and how many visitors clicked around before using site search with the Site Search report
- How far visitors scrolled down a page, by setting up Events at certain break points
Cons: You get a lot of data, but what it means can be somewhat up to interpretation. This might be a good springboard to convince a client that you need to do further testing, but it can’t prove much on its own.
Price: Free!
How to propose a solution
Proving that there is a problem gets your boss or client to the table. The next step is proposing a solution and proposing it well.
The most effective way I’ve found to pitch a design change is to actually mock up your solution. If you have access to design tools, definitely use those. I don’t, though, so I either modify the HTML with Chrome’s Inspect Element feature or use a combination of the Windows Snipping Tool and Paint.
Snipping Tool & MS Paint
I know, no one gets design cred from using MS Paint. But I’m a child of the ’90s, and Paint was my first introduction to design software, so it’s easy for me to use. The point here isn’t to use Paint necessarily, but to use whichever program you have access to and is easy to use. Don’t stop yourself from creating designs just because you don’t own a copy of Dreamweaver or Photoshop.
When I want to mock up a dramatically different version of a page, I use the Snipping Tool to take a picture of the webpage as it currently is, then modify the parts that I want to. The selector makes it easy to move elements around. If Paint doesn’t have an option I need, I just use other Office products:
- For text overlays and adding a variety of shapes, I’ll often use Word, since it has a lot of text box options
- For color changes and setting a transparent color, I use PowerPoint, because as far as I know it’s the only Office product that has that option
- For text changes, I’ll modify the HTML in Chrome (see section below), then copy that over to my Paint design
Is this hack-y? Yes. Is it impressive? No. But it gets the job done. All you need at the end is a design good enough to communicate your idea. Once you get sign-off, actual designers will make sure that the details turn out right.
Rewriting the HTML
As I mentioned above, this works best if what you’re doing is modifying the existing text or images. You can either download the HTML of a page, modify it, and share that, or you can use Chrome’s Inspect Element to quickly modify text and take a picture of the result. It took me 15 seconds to change the text on Moz’ homepage:

Just right click wherever you want to edit on your page while in Chrome and click “Inspect Element.” If you want to make color changes or image changes, it’ll be a little more complicated, but still doable.
You can do this in Firefox as well with Firefox’s add-on,
Firebug.
Once you’ve got a mock up, save it and send it on to your boss/client with your description of the changes you’ve made, the stats from your tests, and why your solution is solving those problems. (Just don’t mention how you made that mock up.)
How to test your solution
If you or a dev can build you variation pages:
Google Experiments

Image from Marketing Engine Land, which includes more details on Google Experiments.
If you’ve got a developer who can build out your suggested change,
Google Experiments is a free, reliable, and easy to use tool to track results. It’s integrated into Google Analytics, so it uses the conversion metrics you already have set up (this may mean you’ll have to set up a new goal to cover your test’s desired outcome).
Cons: You have to create your own variation pages.
Price: Free!
If dev resources are limited:
Optimizely

Optimizely does need a bit of dev work to install a JavaScript code onto your site, but once it’s there, you can edit the HTML for tests with their web interface, without talking to a developer. You can edit with their editor or use actual HTML, meaning the tool doesn’t require HTML skills, but still allows those able to write HTML the extra precision they can get from making changes to the code directly.
As a consultant, I
love working with clients who have Optimizely installed, because I can take a test from start to finish. I prove the problem, propose a solution, set up the test, and present results, all without my point of contact having to take time out of his or her busy schedule to make any changes. And, once you have numeric results, it’s easy to prove the value of your suggested change and get it into the dev queue.
Cons: You have to start with the core page and then modify elements with JavaScript, so you can’t make dramatic changes
Price: Based on your monthly traffic, prices start at $19/month
Make a solid argument for change
Assuming that each step supported your initial ideas, you now have more than enough data to strongly support making the change you suggested. When you make your recommendation, take the time to tell the story of what you went through—getting user feedback, coming up with a solution, and proving the solution works. Clients and bosses feel a lot more comfortable with your conclusions if they see how thoroughly you researched the issue.
Has anyone else gone through a similar process? Any tools you prefer, or tips you’d like to add? Share in the comments below!
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!
Sub Domain use on single website
sub domain
Random Little SEO Tips Anyone Can Use
The problem with sharing SEO tips is that when more people use them they tend to become abused and spammy. But there are technical things you can share that should not become too problematic. Well, it’s all on you if…
SearchCap: Apple Maps Choices, Google RTBF Solicitations & AdWords PLA Test
Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web. From Search Engine Land: Reassess How You Prioritize Your E-Commerce PPC Campaign Builds Over the last couple of years, the prioritization o…
Twitter Engagement Study: Top Apps, Content Sources & Profiles Among Search Marketers
In its latest report, “How Search Marketers Engage on Twitter,” social insights company Leadtail looked at hundreds of U.S. search marketers (SEMs) on Twitter to discover what topics they talked about and which content they consumed and shared.
Yahoo Directory Listings: Are They Worth It?
The result of good SEO is traffic, conversions, and community. Recently, a conversation around the value of the Yahoo directory listing came up at SEER, and it turns out that, in most cases, there is no traffic coming from Yahoo directory listings. In gambling terms, if you bet that a Yahoo directory listing won’t get […]
Organic Search Accounts for Up to 64% of Website Traffic [STUDY]
Inspired by Groupon deindexing itself from Google and finding 60 percent of their direct traffic was actually organic search, Conductor reveals data showing that organic search is actually responsible for driving 64 percent of traffic to websites.
Reassess How You Prioritize Your E-Commerce PPC Campaign Builds
Over the last couple of years, the prioritization of e-commerce PPC campaign builds has shifted dramatically. With the rise of Google Shopping and with dynamic solutions now available to advertisers, standard Search Network text-ad campaign builds fall down the priority list. In today’s world…
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
Apple Maps To Offer Choice Of Google, Others For Directions
According to Cult of Mac Apple is doing something very interesting with iOS 8 Maps. It’s giving people a choice of apps to use for directions. A GIF in the article shows that once a destination is located users will be able to choose directions from, presumably, any mapping-related app…
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.