Open Letter: Why Search Engine Land Will & Won’t Cover Someone Being Penalized By Google

It’s been big news recently about major brands and Google penalties, and the floodgates feel open on people spotting even more brands possibly hit out there. Some new crackdown by Google? No. It’s the rise of hyperactive attention in this area, and that’s turning into a problem….

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

Valentine’s Day Google Logo Tells 6 “This American Life” Love Stories With An Intro From Ira Glass

Today, Google is celebrating Valentine’s Day with a heartwarming logo that includes six different stories of love with an introduction from NPR radio personality and host of This American Life Ira Glass. When you go to Google’s homepage, the logo is slightly faded out and the letters…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

Consumer electronics SEO: Amazon comes top for organic and paid visibility

Apple.com and Argos.co.uk both also appeared in the top five most visible brands for both paid and organic search.

The report, published by Epiphany, analyses the most visible websites across Google’s paid and organic search results, where visibility is defined by Searchmetrics’ ‘paid visibility’ and ‘SEO visibility’ scores.

The report looks in more detail at how these brands achieved such high visibility, but for this blog I’ll just summarise the organic findings.

Organic search rankings

When it comes to buying, consumers want to use brands they know and trust. Technical knowledge can be overlooked for a trusted returns policy or an extended warranty from a recognisable brand, such as John Lewis’ two-year guarantee on all products.

The report shows that Amazon dominates in terms of both visibility and number of keywords, which is to be expected given its extensive product range.

However that logic doesn’t necessarily ring true throughout the rest of the rankings. For example, Apple is third most visible overall and appears for 616,491 keywords while Argos appears for less than half that amount despite its extensive range of products.

Most visible brands from Searchmetrics data for organic search

Many specialist online retailers appear near the bottom of the most visible brands list, as these will generally target more specific electronics-focused keywords, hence the lower number of organic keywords.

Domain authority

Domain authority is largely accepted to be one of the best measures of a website’s ability to rank for its target keywords.  

This chart shows that in general the higher a brand’s domain authority the more visible it is in organic search, though there are a few notable exceptions.

Sites such as Very.co.uk, which is online-only, are likely to have a large focus on SEO built around targeted website content and link acquisition strategies, with the aim of ranking primarily for competitive keywords that generate high volumes of traffic and conversions.

Link Acquisition

Finally, let’s take a look at how many links each of the sites acquired in the preceding 60 days according to Majestic SEO.

This chart shows link acquisition against the total number of linking domains and domain authority.

This shows the extent to which the top sites are acquiring new links as they attempt to maintain and improve their organic search visibility. It also reveals a correlation (not a causation) between high site visibility and strong link metrics.

It’s worth noting that Dell and HP both have high domain authorities and a high number of linking domains, yet a lower visibility than competitors with similarly high numbers of links. 

The report points out that this is the likely result of those brands having a more specific keyword data set – because they only sell their own products, they rank for fewer keywords, whereas the more visible brands sell a wider breadth of products.

SES London Day 3 – Driving Business Value with a Social and Content Master Plan #SESLon

Our coverage of SES London continues with this session from day 3 where Heather Robinson and Bas van den Beld talk about social and content marketing plans.

Post from Russell O’Sullivan on State of Digital
SES London Day 3 – Driving Business Value with a Social and Content Master Plan #SESLon

Google’s Patent on Site Speed as a Ranking Signal

On April 9th, 2009, many people developed an interest in speeding up their websites, after reading a post on the Google Webmaster Central Blog – Using site speed in web search ranking.

On the same day, Google’s Matt Cutts published Google incorporating site speed in search rankings on his blog. These posts introduced site […]

The post Google’s Patent on Site Speed as a Ranking Signal appeared first on SEO by the Sea.

The Best Way to Suck at Marketing – Whiteboard Friday

Posted by randfish

When we take a data- and profit-driven approach to marketing, we can get so caught up in maximizing returns that we forget we’re dealing with people, treating our customers as simple transactions. If we’re looking for loyalty, we need to change that approach.

In today’s Whiteboard Friday, Rand details the virtues of marketing for long-term success and moving away from that transactional model.

The Best Way to Suck at Marketing – Whiteboard Friday

For reference, here’s a still of this week’s whiteboard!

Video Transcription

Howdy Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week I wanted to talk about something I see from a lot of marketers where we just kill ourselves, people. We’re dying. We’re really sucking at our jobs, and the reason seems to be very consistent. It seems like this is almost the best way, the most popular way to suck at marketing. I’ll show you what I’m talking about.

So here’s our marketer, and he or she has good intentions in mind, but he goes out and looks at every opportunity with the same lens on. So goes out and looks at partnerships and sees only the possibility of business development. Goes out and looks at other blogs and other places in the industry where they might contribute and sees only a guest post opportunity, a chance to earn a link. Goes and looks at their landing pages and sees customers, potential customers coming to their site and thinks only: “How many? What’s the highest percent of those people that I can possibly convert to put in their credit card right now and buy something or make a transaction happen?”

They look at conferences and events and see only, “All right, how do I speak there?” Or “Should I sponsor it?” And “How do I get the most customers I possibly can out of that event? How do I get coverage from press, media, and bloggers? How do I turn this advertising placement into ROI? How do I turn these people on social media, who are interested in my topic, into people who follow me, become my customers, and amplify my content?”

This transactional model of thinking is actually really similar to how we do a lot of discussion in the marketing field. I’m guilty of this myself. I talk about: “Oh, well, if you’re looking for folks on social media, how do you turn them into followers of yours? How do you turn them into amplifiers?”

These are important topics. They’re good tactics, but this view, this idea that all these people are just a chance to make money, just an opportunity, it’s almost like the prostitution of marketing. If you think about the difference between dating and paying for a physical relationship, they’re thought of in such different ways. One has all sorts of positive and romantic and long-term associations in the world, and the other has incredibly negative connotations. I won’t get into the morality of our different views on these things, but this same thinking applies in the marketing world. We’ve all been on the receiving end of it. We’ve all been these people who are reached out to by this transactional marketer.

Transactional marketing results in only one thing — transactional relationships. Those transactional relationships are representative because every interaction is viewed exclusively through this “how are you going to become money for me,” which is an ugly, ugly way to think and an ugly way to be thought of. We all can feel it when it’s coming from someone else. It means treating people merely as conduits. They’re conduits for either attracting or becoming customers. When you think in this model, you prioritize something that’s actually dangerous to your long-term success — your short-term success.

It’s funny how the inverse correlation works. But if you’re constantly focused on the short-term return over the long-term relationship or relationship potential, the transactional model means that people and customers are going to abandon your brand as soon as it’s no longer the best transaction for them because they have no preexisting relationship. They have no loyalty. They have no love for you or your company or your product. It’s merely, “What are you doing for me right now because I’m giving you dollars?”

No one is cheering for your success. That’s so frustrating. How do you build a community? How do you build a social following? How do you attract an audience if no one’s cheering for your success? These folks are somewhere between ambivalent and sometimes antagonistic.

I’m sure you can think of brands. A lot of times people complain about this when it comes to utilities. Think of your relationship with your cable television provider or with an airline with whom you’ve been very disappointed. These kinds of classic transactional models apply. There’s no brand loyalty. Occasionally, when there is, it’s so special, so unique, so rare and weird, that we talk about it and blog about it and tweet about it and share it. Perhaps the worst part is there’s no long-term magnification.

One of the things that I always talk about, that Moz always talks about, and that we’ve had a lot of success in investing in channels of all kinds is that because there is a long-term focus, because there’s a relationship that’s being built, we are essentially biasing to get long-term returns over short-term returns. That means, over the long term, more and more people magnifying, amplifying, saying nice things, helping us out when they don’t need to because they have that connection with the brand.

If you’re missing that, the flywheel that you should be building with things like SEO, with things like social media marketing, with things like content marketing encounters too much friction, and it actually becomes a transactional model, just like paid advertising, and you lose a ton of the benefit that you would normally get from inbound channels. So don’t do it.

Instead of doing this, I would urge you to seek common ground with every kind of relationship that you build and seek common ground apart from purely the relationship, although business and professional topics are certainly great places to start with those. If you can find the things that you have in common — these two for these guys — among any of these kinds of partners that you’re interacting with and any type of outreach that you’re doing, any type of relationship that you encounter, it’s going to remove the purely transactional from the model.

The thing is it has to be authentic. You can’t do this in such a way that you’re sort of going down a checklist of, “Oh, yeah, hi Fred. It’s nice to meet you. Are you also a Seahawks fan, because I am a fan of this football team?” It’s insanity. It’s obvious.

Authentically seeking out relationships as you’re going relationship building, rather than biasing and prioritizing the transactional model, can be felt in every interaction that you have. Go out of your way to help. Go out of your way to help, and do it before you’re asked to do it.

One of the things that I love to do is when I encounter someone who impresses me, a product that impresses me, a company that impresses me, I like to share it. Because I have a reasonably nice social following, that actually turns into a lot of amplification, and those people are often very appreciative. But when someone shares something of mine, even if they have five followers on Twitter, no presence on Facebook, they pinned something on Pinterest, and they have four followers on their Pinterest board, it doesn’t matter. Especially if they’re doing it before there’s any kind of interaction or before there’s any kind of ask from me, it shows me that they truly care and they value something of mine, and that feels good. That’s a great way to start a relationship.

Don’t negotiate hard to get every last penny. I think that one of the things that we’re trained to do again as marketers is, in these kinds of marketing opportunities, we go out and we see, “Well, what’s the maximum that I can possibly get? I’m going to push this other person up against the wall until they’re getting minimum return and I’m getting maximum return.”

This is actually a terrible way to build a relationship. Of course, it results in this feature where people abandon the brand as soon as you’re not providing the best service to them or as soon as you’re not the best transactional option for them.

So if you can follow these things and go and change the way you do outreach, the way you do social media marketing, the way you do business development, the way you do advertising placements, the way you do pitches, generally speaking, I think you’re going to see a much greater return.

All right, everyone. Hope you’ve enjoyed this edition of Whiteboard Friday. We’ll see you again next time. Take care.

Video transcription by Speechpad.com

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!

Search Marketing Expo – SMX West, March 11-13 in San Jose, CA. Register Now!

Join the most accomplished internet marketers in the world at SMX West, March 11-13 in San Jose, CA. Check out the agenda featuring three days of tactic-rich sessions, keynotes, invaluable networking opportunities, and more. All Access, Digital Marketing Summit, Workshop & free Expo+ passes…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

No Budget for SMX West? Attend Learn With Google, Sessions, Keynotes & More with a Free Expo+ Pass

Attend sessions on internet and search engine marketing from Google, Covario, Page One Power and Stone Temple Consulting. Meet leading solution providers. Participate in SMX Theater presentations and network with your peers. All for FREE – as long as you pre-register for an SMX West Expo+…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

Bing Ads Expands Mobile Sitelinks Coverage In US, Will Roll Out To EU Markets

Bing Ads announced today that it will complete roll out of sitelink extensions on mobile devices in the US in coming weeks. In a post on the Bing Ads blog, Microsoft’s Eliot Li said they currently have enabled over 60 percent of the mobile traffic on the Yahoo Bing Network (YBN) to run…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

Will 11th Hour Objections Derail The Google-EU Antitrust Settlement?

When the European Commission recently announced yet another antitrust settlement with Google the matter appeared to be coming to an end. This was the third proposed settlement from Google but indications from EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia suggested that it was essentially final and…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

Infinite scroll search-friendly recommendations

Webmaster Level: Advanced

Your site’s news feed or pinboard might use infinite scroll—much to your users’ delight! When it comes to delighting Googlebot, however, that can be another story. With infinite scroll, crawlers cannot always emulate manual user behavior–like scrolling or clicking a button to load more items–so they don’t always access all individual items in the feed or gallery. If crawlers can’t access your content, it’s unlikely to surface in search results.

To make sure that search engines can crawl individual items linked from an infinite scroll page, make sure that you or your content management system produces a paginated series (component pages) to go along with your infinite scroll.


Infinite scroll page is made “search-friendly” when converted to a paginated series — each component page has a similar <title> with rel=next/prev values declared in the <head>.

You can see this type of behavior in action in the infinite scroll with pagination demo created by Webmaster Trends Analyst, John Mueller. The demo illustrates some key search-engine friendly points:

  • Coverage: All individual items are accessible. With traditional infinite scroll, individual items displayed after the initial page load aren’t discoverable to crawlers.
  • No overlap: Each item is listed only once in the paginated series (i.e., no duplication of items).

Search-friendly recommendations for infinite scroll

  1. Before you start:
    • Chunk your infinite-scroll page content into component pages that can be accessed when JavaScript is disabled.
    • Determine how much content to include on each page.
      • Be sure that if a searcher came directly to this page, they could easily find the exact item they wanted (e.g., without lots of scrolling before locating the desired content).
      • Maintain reasonable page load time.
    • Divide content so that there’s no overlap between component pages in the series (with the exception of buffering).

  2. The example on the left is search-friendly, the right example isn’t — the right example would cause crawling and indexing of duplicative content.

  3. Structure URLs for infinite scroll search engine processing.
    • Each component page contains a full URL. We recommend full URLs in this situation to minimize potential for configuration error.
      • Good: example.com/category?name=fun-items&page=1
      • Good: example.com/fun-items?lastid=567
      • Less optimal: example.com/fun-items#1
      • Test that each component page (the URL) works to take anyone directly to the content and is accessible/referenceable in a browser without the same cookie or user history.
    • Any key/value URL parameters should follow these recommendations:
      • Be sure the URL shows conceptually the same content two weeks from now.
        • Avoid relative-time based URL parameters:
          example.com/category/page.php?name=fun-items&days-ago=3
      • Create parameters that can surface valuable content to searchers.
        • Avoid non-searcher valuable parameters as the primary method to access content:
          example.com/fun-places?radius=5&lat=40.71&long=-73.40
  4. Configure pagination with each component page containing rel=next and rel=prev values in the <head>. Pagination values in the <body> will be ignored for Google indexing purposes because they could be created with user-generated content (not intended by the webmaster).
  5. Implement replaceState/pushState on the infinite scroll page. (The decision to use one or both is up to you and your site’s user behavior). That said, we recommend including pushState (by itself, or in conjunction with replaceState) for the following:
    • Any user action that resembles a click or actively turning a page.
    • To provide users with the ability to serially backup through the most recently paginated content.
  6. Test!

Written, reviewed, or coded by John Mueller, Maile Ohye, and Joachim Kupke