Google Carousel Eye-Tracking Study: The Big Winner is AdWords

In addition to the Local heat maps & CTR studies that I shared yesterday , Mediative also looked at the behaviors around the Carousel in their study: The Evolution of Google Search Results Pages and Their Effects on User Behaviour”. As with the 7-pack information yesterday, there are limits to this study. The CTR are particularly […]

Panda 4.1: what’s it all about?

What is Google aiming to achieve with Panda 4.1?

Google’s Panda updates are always aiming for quality enhancement of the search engine results.

The first Panda update was known as the content farm update, because it was mainly directed against thin content that was placed on large scale platforms such as ehow or ezinearticles.com.

Panda 4.0 was a major rework of the whole Panda implementation in the algorithm. So Panda 4.1 is just the continuation of what Google did with 4.0.

Where are you seeing the biggest changes so far?

You can see that a Panda update was rolled out just on our list of winners and losers. There is always a pattern on the sites on these lists.

Panda updates are query based. That means that the impact is not on all queries, only a specific set of queries and that’s why you can find a pattern. The changes we saw this time are again directed against a lot of thin content and aggregator sites.

Sites like FindTheBest, Pearltrees or Socialcomments.org aggregate content and present it in a nice, easy-to-consume way.

But they are aggregators which means no unique content and it’s also aggregated like a search engine. And Google doesn’t want search-in-search to rank highly.

Based on what you have seen so far, has Panda 4.1 achieved what Google wanted?

This is a question that only Google can answer. Google is never finished.

Every new iteration of Panda or other updates will increase the quality. But with all the redundancy in the World Wide Web, Google has a lot to do to filter out the noise and increase the relevancy of the results step by step.

What kinds of signals does Google look for to determine low-quality, thin content sites and pages?

There are two different kind of signals. Quantitative signals are based on content and site structure. Qualitative signals are based on user behavior.

For the quantitive signals it is Google’s mission to find sites with unique and rich content. Content with an added value for the user. And with all the data that Google has, it is the next step to take the user signals and weight the results against a group of other results.

Results with worse than average user behavior are sites with a bad user experience. Google is using both signals to determine which results are relevant for the user based on their query.

When a site has too many ‘bad’ signals, the whole site can be dropped out of the rankings. Panda is not just based on some keywords on a website. It always hits a huge part of the page, that’s why Panda is a serious issue. 

What is your advice for sites hit by Panda?

Housekeeping! Many sites just have too much thin content. They have to add value to these pages, find redundant pages and merge them or just delete them if it’s old outdated content.

But importantly, if you don’t do anything it will get worse. These pages that just keep their thin content will have the so called slow-death phenomenon.

They gradually lose visibility over time until nothing is left. That’s why companies should build a Panda proof site before they are affected.

What do you think Google will be looking to deal with in the next update?

Google always wants to improve and to deliver the right result for the right time in the right context.

There will be many more updates where content relevancy will be the key. 

At SMX East; Presenting on Google and the Semantic Web

The Semantic Web is making an even stronger appearance recently at Google than it has in the past. With knowledge panels, carousels listing all kinds of things (and people and places), structured snippets merging query answers with question answers into a single snippet, OneBoxes of many different kinds, and even Hummingbird responding better to longer […]

The post At SMX East; Presenting on Google and the Semantic Web appeared first on SEO by the Sea.

Call Tracking for Local Search: 5 Tips for Optimizing ROI in Today’s Mobile World – October 7 Webcast

Digital Marketing Depot presents “Call Tracking for Local Search: 5 Tips for Optimizing ROI in Today’s Mobile World” on Tuesday October 7 at 1 PM EDT. This webcast covers how local search advertising today requires you to track, score, route, and manage calls the same way you do…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

SPONSOR MESSAGE: Bing Ads Brings Gifts: Holidays by the Numbers

In a joyous season of sales and snow, Bing Ads shows you where the time and money goes… Light up your screen and count the spend during the lucrative holiday retail season. Last year’s holiday retail market was valued at $601.8 Billion. To top it this year, we’ll have to make…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

Google Introduces Automatic Item Updates For PLAs

Up to now, Google has systematically disapproved product listing ads when retailers had price or inventory variances between their product feed and the microdata on their sites. Now, to help retailers maintain consistent visibility in PLAs, Google has launched “automatic item updates”…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

Local Heat Maps – Lots of Attention, Not So Much Clicking

Mediative has published results of their recent eye-tracking and click through research performed last spring that included local pack and carousel results:  The Evolution of Google Search Results Pages and Their Effects on User Behaviour”. They discuss the local implications in a blog post today. While the study has some methodological issues the results are interesting […]