Mon 24 Aug 2009
SEOMoz Search Engine Tanking Factors 2009
Blurb by Shaun Anderson (Hobo)SEOmoz just updated a cool group consensus of search engine ranking factors. From that study, here’s a quick rundown on the most ‘agreed’ search engine tanking factors:
- Cloaking
- Link Aquistion from known link sellers
- Server downtime
- Hidden text
- Links to bad neighbourhoods
- Keyword Stuffed Text
- “Excessive Repetition of the Same Anchor Text in a High Percentage/Quantity of External Links to the Site/Page”
Search Engine Tanking Factors – Algo v Human
It might have been interesting to isolate the algorithm from the human element AKA the Google Web Spam Team. I seeing a lot of old seo tricks like keyword stuffing getting past the G maths that ’shouldn’t’ which would not pass a human review – that is, pages ranking successfully because of individual strengths in particular/other areas even though they might be for instance, keyword stuffed to high heaven – the latter is the whole reason I wouldn’t use it for clients, not the algo.
The algo can weigh you and measure you and think you’re no1 yet when a human reaches your page all you get is keyword stuffed nonsense and that’s without cloaking anything.
I’m looking at one example of that now in a competitor audit for a customer.
Pure crap hat seo which Google loves enough to rank a particular site no1 for a keyword worth £3K for a sale which I need to circumvent in some way. It’s obvious (but not apparent) this competitor site has done something RIGHT, it’s no1, but it’s done EVERYTHING ELSE SO BADLY it will not pass a human spam review site – it’s an embarrassment to Google as it stands.
I think it’s safe to say seo tactics that are violations of Google TOS in Google webmaster guidelines might very well …er, work lol, as long as you don’t get caught (by the algo or the web spam human reviewers). OR they wouldn’t be in there.
A lot of the SEOmoz report is standard seo Google tells you not to do, but the whole report by Rand Fishkin is a great idea (one of the best in SEO Land) and so well presented it’s worth a good look over.
Be sure and chack out these other great seo group interviews.
Did you know when you link to a Hobo SEO post we have search engine friendly links back to your site if approved? Our comments are also search engine friendly you know (once you've commented on a few posts)! Do you need any more encouragement to get involved in the conversation ;)

Hello Shaun,
I heard about you through an interview at ozdomainer.com with Ben Wilks. I have a question I have not had any luck finding the answer to.
What’s the best way to launch when you own both the singular and plural domain names for a keyword product site? Ex. squeezehorn.com and squeezehorns.com (minimal site, but good example for testing). I currently have the singular 301 re-directed to the plural, because the plural makes more sense from a branding perspective. But while squeezehorns.com shows up first page in most engines for the search term ’squeeze horns’, it’s nowhere to be seen for ’squeeze horn’. Is it just because there’s more competition for the keyword ’squeeze horn’? I would think this is an obvious question but I can find nary a mention of it.
Best,
JohnH
There is nothing more annoying that finding the first results are full of crap and absolutely nothing to do with what you are looking for.
Mind you when you think about the google spam team how many websites must they have to look at on a daily basis I don’t envy them of that job!
Great link to the crap hat seo article, bookmarked that for later reading!
Good luck getting over that site, Id love to know what your going to do to fight it, but I’m guessing you can really share some of your processes. Could be a good subject for an articel though?
T
@john – In my experience buyers there’s more of an intent to buy when pople are looking for plurals, so i usually configure my strategies appropriately.
@ Tom – I have a few ideas
Is there any major differences between this years and the last report?
A side by side comparison (where appropriate) would be useful.
Just in case it’s read down here…
Search Engine Tanking Factors
its amazing how people still try this and get away with it