Wed 2 Jul 2008
What’s The Best Keyword Meta Tags Formula?
Blurb by Shaun Anderson (Hobo)Ahh, a bastian of crap and unethical seo companies – the meta-keywords tag! How many crap seo companies mention cleaning and optimising this tag in their presentations? Companies that waste time on these waste clients money.
<meta name="Keywords" content="seo, search engine optimisation, optimization" /
I have one piece of advice with the meta keyword tag, which like the title tag, goes in the head section of your web page, forget about them.
If you are relying on meta-keyword optimisation to rank for terms, your dead in the water. From what I see, Google ignores them or at least places no weight in them to rank websites. I hear rumours Yahoo and MSN might read them, but really, a seo has more important things to worry about than this nonsense.
What about other search engines that use them? Hang on while I submit my site to those 75,000 engines first lol
Yes, 10 years ago search engines liked looking at your meta-keywords (those were the days!). I’ve seen OPs in forums ponder which is the best way to write these tags – with commas, with spaces, limiting to how many characters….
Forget about meta-keyword tags – they are a pointless pointless waste of time and bandwidth. Could probably save a rain-forest with the bandwidth costs we save if everybody removed their keyword tags
I’ll be removing most of mine shortly to do my bit for the environment, and I certainly don’t waste valuable client time putting them in new sites. Even (maybe especially) if I can auto-generate them.
Tin Foil Hat Time
So you have a new site….. you fill your home page meta tags with the 20 keywords you want to rank for – hey, that’s what optimisation is all about, isn’t it?
You’ve just told Google by the third line of text what to sandbox you for
And wasn’t meta name=”Keywords” originally for words that weren’t actually on the page that would help classify the document?
I had better take this tin foil hat off because now I am thinking if everybody removed them and stopped abusing Google would probably start looking at them but that’s the way of things in search engines.
Ignore them. Not even a ’second order’ effect, in my opinion – and that’s all this is, remember.
Check the number of characters in your meta keywords tag.
Did you know when you link to a Hobo SEO post we have search engine friendly links back to your site if approved? Our comments are also search engine friendly you know (once you've commented on a few posts)! Do you need any more encouragement to get involved in the conversation ;)

What are your thoughts on using keyword meta for typos and mis-spellings?
Good question. I read somewhere once that this might be useful, but if I really want to rank for a misspelling, I’ll get links to the page with misspellings in them from forums and the like – I think this works better
I like it. I was at a meeting yesterday with a potential new client pitching for their business, they had pages and pages of meta tag descriptions they were writing because their current SEO asked them too!! It’s a funny world out there.
Question for you: I believe that the skill of an SEO is based on their ability to deliver results for their clients, assuming these techniques are all white hat, do you believe that this industry requires an accreditation/set standards to cut the wheat from the chaf? Or the customers should take more responsibility and refine their buying criteria?
Thank-you for “laying” this one on the line.
In the past, I’ve always felt like I was wasting my time when I did any work with my keyword meta tags. Now I don’t spend any time in this area at all.
It is nice to have your confirmation that keyword meta tags are a waste of time.