<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Test &amp; Observe Live Google Pagerank, With A Word?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/measure-live-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/measure-live-pagerank/</link>
	<description>A Scottish SEO Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:24:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/measure-live-pagerank/#comment-15937</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=443#comment-15937</guid>
		<description>I like where you went with this, but I guess I am not as strong on this stuff as you guys are and got a tid bit confused at the end. Oh well. Either way, I am just getting into playing around and tweaking little things. I guess in a way it is a form of genetic programming. We take a bunch of little permutations and combine the one that seem to do the best. Then we start tweaking others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like where you went with this, but I guess I am not as strong on this stuff as you guys are and got a tid bit confused at the end. Oh well. Either way, I am just getting into playing around and tweaking little things. I guess in a way it is a form of genetic programming. We take a bunch of little permutations and combine the one that seem to do the best. Then we start tweaking others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/measure-live-pagerank/#comment-15933</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=443#comment-15933</guid>
		<description>&quot;Or maybe the difference in PR is so small that youâ€™re changing it just by observing the results?&quot; - Sounds like quantum physics or &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SchrÃ¶dinger&#039;s cat&lt;/a&gt; bunkum :)

From what I see, pages full of PR at the top, pages without PR are at then end of the results. It&#039;s black and white what I am reading from the results - I guess people could try it on their own site and compare results.

It will be interesting to see the next toolbar update and how the scores correlate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Or maybe the difference in PR is so small that youâ€™re changing it just by observing the results?&#8221; &#8211; Sounds like quantum physics or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat">SchrÃ¶dinger&#8217;s cat</a> bunkum <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>From what I see, pages full of PR at the top, pages without PR are at then end of the results. It&#8217;s black and white what I am reading from the results &#8211; I guess people could try it on their own site and compare results.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see the next toolbar update and how the scores correlate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/measure-live-pagerank/#comment-15930</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=443#comment-15930</guid>
		<description>I think it all sounds pretty plausible.

You say this: &quot;PR fluctuates wildly on internal pages especially at the lower end of the scale, CONSTANTLY&quot;

My guess is that Google doesn&#039;t aim to sort everything absolutely perfectly. The difference between a page with PR 1.222 and PR 1.225 is small enough that Google doesn&#039;t necessarily need to spend the computing power to put them in perfect order...right? It would make more sense to make sure that everything is generally in the right place, within five spots or so, then precisely sort the top results.

Along that same line, it could be that Google&#039;s sorting ignores anything after a set number of significant digits. So, pages of 1.22223 and 1.22224 could have functionally the same value, which means that either one could end up before the other.

Or maybe the difference in PR is so small that you&#039;re changing it just by observing the results? Typically, it would take data from hundreds or thousands of searchers to affect the order of the results, but once you get to the lower end with relatively little PR, maybe it just takes one person?

Just thinking out loud; these are definitely just guesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it all sounds pretty plausible.</p>
<p>You say this: &#8220;PR fluctuates wildly on internal pages especially at the lower end of the scale, CONSTANTLY&#8221;</p>
<p>My guess is that Google doesn&#8217;t aim to sort everything absolutely perfectly. The difference between a page with PR 1.222 and PR 1.225 is small enough that Google doesn&#8217;t necessarily need to spend the computing power to put them in perfect order&#8230;right? It would make more sense to make sure that everything is generally in the right place, within five spots or so, then precisely sort the top results.</p>
<p>Along that same line, it could be that Google&#8217;s sorting ignores anything after a set number of significant digits. So, pages of 1.22223 and 1.22224 could have functionally the same value, which means that either one could end up before the other.</p>
<p>Or maybe the difference in PR is so small that you&#8217;re changing it just by observing the results? Typically, it would take data from hundreds or thousands of searchers to affect the order of the results, but once you get to the lower end with relatively little PR, maybe it just takes one person?</p>
<p>Just thinking out loud; these are definitely just guesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilt Packages</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/measure-live-pagerank/#comment-16588</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilt Packages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=443#comment-16588</guid>
		<description>Every time I try to understand pagerank it&#039;s different advice blog to blog... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I try to understand pagerank it&#8217;s different advice blog to blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
