<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Spent A Year Adding Content &amp; My Competitors Nicked My Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/</link>
	<description>A Scottish SEO Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/#comment-17891</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=2117#comment-17891</guid>
		<description>I would still like to be on page 1 for search engine optimisation one day lol - next year will do. I&#039;m not using client sites to do it though lol.

This time next year - page one in Google UK SERPS for SEO &amp; search engine optimisation, and a 75,000 monthly uniques and 10,000 subscribers. That will do lol :)

Cheers for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would still like to be on page 1 for search engine optimisation one day lol &#8211; next year will do. I&#8217;m not using client sites to do it though lol.</p>
<p>This time next year &#8211; page one in Google UK SERPS for SEO &#038; search engine optimisation, and a 75,000 monthly uniques and 10,000 subscribers. That will do lol <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/#comment-17890</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=2117#comment-17890</guid>
		<description>Yeh. The top ranking web design companies are using a lot of anchored footer spam on client sites and have been for as long as I have been on the block. I used to own a web design company and I never did it. As soon as I left &quot;web design&quot; and &quot;seo&quot; footer spam was rolled out on all client sites.

Like yourself, I think web design is a different story, but I still think using &quot;web design&quot; and other words as the anchor is a P take. Stuff like that devalues a site. I&#039;ve seen a lot of stupid ones like &quot;[web design] by [web design]&quot; and even &quot;[0800 number] by [0800 numbers]&quot;. Where will it all end? &quot;Our managing director swears by [viagra]&quot;? If its something like &quot;Site designed by [Hobo]&quot; I think its fine. If I was building sites, I&#039;d just add a link back to my site on an &quot;about the site&quot; page along with accessibility and open source blurbs.

Personally, I wouldn&#039;t put your rep. on the line if you are thinking of adding keyword rich links to SEO client sites. Enquiries from generic page one SEO/design terms are largely junk - people who have come up with the next big thing with no internet knowledge and think they can do it by hiring an agency for Â£500. I&#039;d rather 50K uniques / month than page one for SEO any day :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh. The top ranking web design companies are using a lot of anchored footer spam on client sites and have been for as long as I have been on the block. I used to own a web design company and I never did it. As soon as I left &#8220;web design&#8221; and &#8220;seo&#8221; footer spam was rolled out on all client sites.</p>
<p>Like yourself, I think web design is a different story, but I still think using &#8220;web design&#8221; and other words as the anchor is a P take. Stuff like that devalues a site. I&#8217;ve seen a lot of stupid ones like &#8220;[web design] by [web design]&#8221; and even &#8220;[0800 number] by [0800 numbers]&#8220;. Where will it all end? &#8220;Our managing director swears by [viagra]&#8220;? If its something like &#8220;Site designed by [Hobo]&#8221; I think its fine. If I was building sites, I&#8217;d just add a link back to my site on an &#8220;about the site&#8221; page along with accessibility and open source blurbs.</p>
<p>Personally, I wouldn&#8217;t put your rep. on the line if you are thinking of adding keyword rich links to SEO client sites. Enquiries from generic page one SEO/design terms are largely junk &#8211; people who have come up with the next big thing with no internet knowledge and think they can do it by hiring an agency for Â£500. I&#8217;d rather 50K uniques / month than page one for SEO any day <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/#comment-17889</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=2117#comment-17889</guid>
		<description>HI David. I&#039;ve got some legacy footer links (I think) from years ago. But for the last while, I just don&#039;t take the links from SEO clients: I think web design clients is a slightly different situation, so I will get a link from those (although often their nofollowed now). To be honest I&#039;m considering the whole strategy - as it clearly isn&#039;t hurting competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI David. I&#8217;ve got some legacy footer links (I think) from years ago. But for the last while, I just don&#8217;t take the links from SEO clients: I think web design clients is a slightly different situation, so I will get a link from those (although often their nofollowed now). To be honest I&#8217;m considering the whole strategy &#8211; as it clearly isn&#8217;t hurting competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/#comment-17888</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=2117#comment-17888</guid>
		<description>I am glad to see that there is another SEO company that doesn&#039;t add &quot;footer spam&quot; on to all clients as standard. By that, I mean keyword rich links back to their site in client footers like &quot;[SEO] and [Web Design] by SwizzGubbins&quot;. Like yourself, I am not to bothered what bilge people crank to up their SERPs, but I always think that footer spam on clients&#039; sites is unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad to see that there is another SEO company that doesn&#8217;t add &#8220;footer spam&#8221; on to all clients as standard. By that, I mean keyword rich links back to their site in client footers like &#8220;[SEO] and [Web Design] by SwizzGubbins&#8221;. Like yourself, I am not to bothered what bilge people crank to up their SERPs, but I always think that footer spam on clients&#8217; sites is unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/#comment-17879</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=2117#comment-17879</guid>
		<description>If your site has 5,000 pages it might raise a red flag if all of your good anchor text rich links point to the homepage. Get around this by creating multiple keyword landing pages and deep link to them with a mix of anchor text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your site has 5,000 pages it might raise a red flag if all of your good anchor text rich links point to the homepage. Get around this by creating multiple keyword landing pages and deep link to them with a mix of anchor text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luxs</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/#comment-17875</link>
		<dc:creator>luxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=2117#comment-17875</guid>
		<description>2 Amrit - If you make a website to earn some money only by selling cheap links you should prohibited for  Yahoo to index your site - just to keep your links in secret for all peoples.

High SERP for some keywords mean good traffic for these keywords, but all SEO traffic may have a lot of long keywords, which are related with good content.
So I do prefer now to create a lot of content, but spend about 20% of my time for link building as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 Amrit &#8211; If you make a website to earn some money only by selling cheap links you should prohibited for  Yahoo to index your site &#8211; just to keep your links in secret for all peoples.</p>
<p>High SERP for some keywords mean good traffic for these keywords, but all SEO traffic may have a lot of long keywords, which are related with good content.<br />
So I do prefer now to create a lot of content, but spend about 20% of my time for link building as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Vehicle Car Leasing</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/#comment-17867</link>
		<dc:creator>First Vehicle Car Leasing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=2117#comment-17867</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean. we&#039;ve been involved with many seo companies and we&#039;ve taken the time out to create a great site and add unique content but firms with crappy sites still rank above us on the merit of crappy links.... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean. we&#8217;ve been involved with many seo companies and we&#8217;ve taken the time out to create a great site and add unique content but firms with crappy sites still rank above us on the merit of crappy links&#8230;. <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amrit Gill</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/i-spent-a-year-adding-content-my-competitors-nicked-my-rankings/#comment-17866</link>
		<dc:creator>Amrit Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=2117#comment-17866</guid>
		<description>Humm - this is simply down for one tactic - scaremongering.  Matt Cutts and La Google Crew have been going around pushing their best practices on, hinting at warnings of what not to do.  And well - we&#039;re all scared of the drop in traffic from google so we all follow suit and following these best practices.  On the other hand there have been these sites who ignore the rules and continue to purchase links from sites that are easily detectable from simply looking at their inlinks at yahoo site explorer!  These sites are the ones that simply capture the top 3 spots with spammy context that really isn&#039;t that valuable.

Hopefully - our SEO competition - Tour De SEO(www.iamsearch.co.uk) will help highlight best practices on SEO aligned with great content as we go along.

Keep up the great work - great having a voice from the Brits!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humm &#8211; this is simply down for one tactic &#8211; scaremongering.  Matt Cutts and La Google Crew have been going around pushing their best practices on, hinting at warnings of what not to do.  And well &#8211; we&#8217;re all scared of the drop in traffic from google so we all follow suit and following these best practices.  On the other hand there have been these sites who ignore the rules and continue to purchase links from sites that are easily detectable from simply looking at their inlinks at yahoo site explorer!  These sites are the ones that simply capture the top 3 spots with spammy context that really isn&#8217;t that valuable.</p>
<p>Hopefully &#8211; our SEO competition &#8211; Tour De SEO(www.iamsearch.co.uk) will help highlight best practices on SEO aligned with great content as we go along.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work &#8211; great having a voice from the Brits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
