<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing Matt Cutts Google Minty Freshness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/</link>
	<description>A Scottish SEO Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-703</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments guys.

@ Matt - No according to GWMT the page is there with all my internal links showing up so that&#039;s not the issue I&#039;m afraid. Thanks for the comment - hope you stick around (hint) my next post is a cracker! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments guys.</p>
<p>@ Matt &#8211; No according to GWMT the page is there with all my internal links showing up so that&#8217;s not the issue I&#8217;m afraid. Thanks for the comment &#8211; hope you stick around (hint) my next post is a cracker! <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hopkins - Vertical Leap</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hopkins - Vertical Leap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-706</guid>
		<description>Hi Shaun

I have seen this same issue with one of our sites - very recently.

Quick question - in Google Webmaster Tools (GWT), does the main page for your blog - http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/ - appear in list of pages with INTERNAL links?

We have a site that exhibiting the behaviour you mention - blog results not showing up instantly in Google but its still getting crawled every couple of days etc.  But interestingly, the root for the blog is not in the list of internal pages - despite there being many links to this page.  Other individual blog posts that are cross referenced/deep linked are in the list - just not the root page.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shaun</p>
<p>I have seen this same issue with one of our sites &#8211; very recently.</p>
<p>Quick question &#8211; in Google Webmaster Tools (GWT), does the main page for your blog &#8211; <a href="http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/</a> &#8211; appear in list of pages with INTERNAL links?</p>
<p>We have a site that exhibiting the behaviour you mention &#8211; blog results not showing up instantly in Google but its still getting crawled every couple of days etc.  But interestingly, the root for the blog is not in the list of internal pages &#8211; despite there being many links to this page.  Other individual blog posts that are cross referenced/deep linked are in the list &#8211; just not the root page.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa - SEOAware.com</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa - SEOAware.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-708</guid>
		<description>You know I noticed a change, but only after my hosting company insisted I add the WP-Cache Plugin to my blog. Anyone else notice this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I noticed a change, but only after my hosting company insisted I add the WP-Cache Plugin to my blog. Anyone else notice this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Optimisation-Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Optimisation-Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-707</guid>
		<description>I have the feeling that Google is slowing down on a lot of things.

Here is an example of Google being VERY slow in updating itself:

A site (home page) disappeared on the SERP&#039;s 12 Feb due to other sites copying it. We changed the content and Google recached 15th Feb. 19 Feb the snippet showed the update, but the cache still showed the old version. Now 20 Feb, and the Google cache correctly shows the updated version, but when I search for unique text on the page, the site still does not show. The top SERP&#039;s have not yet come back.

A month ago when the same thing happened, the site was recached the next day, and back in the top SERP&#039;s later that day.

VERY slow at the moment.

And as an aside - what is your experience with scraper sites copying content and destroying results. Do you have a post on this - so this post does not get totally off topic ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the feeling that Google is slowing down on a lot of things.</p>
<p>Here is an example of Google being VERY slow in updating itself:</p>
<p>A site (home page) disappeared on the SERP&#8217;s 12 Feb due to other sites copying it. We changed the content and Google recached 15th Feb. 19 Feb the snippet showed the update, but the cache still showed the old version. Now 20 Feb, and the Google cache correctly shows the updated version, but when I search for unique text on the page, the site still does not show. The top SERP&#8217;s have not yet come back.</p>
<p>A month ago when the same thing happened, the site was recached the next day, and back in the top SERP&#8217;s later that day.</p>
<p>VERY slow at the moment.</p>
<p>And as an aside &#8211; what is your experience with scraper sites copying content and destroying results. Do you have a post on this &#8211; so this post does not get totally off topic <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Rivera</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Rivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-716</guid>
		<description>These things can drive us bloggers mad with worry. There&#039;s nothing like breaking a story only to see it sit there unnoticed by search for days. I&#039;ve personally had good luck with fast indexing, but I have many friends that tear their hair out with frustration while their hot news cools during a long wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These things can drive us bloggers mad with worry. There&#8217;s nothing like breaking a story only to see it sit there unnoticed by search for days. I&#8217;ve personally had good luck with fast indexing, but I have many friends that tear their hair out with frustration while their hot news cools during a long wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Noticed a similar issue with Fused Nation lately as well.

New posts are included the regular index almost instantly (no cache though) but not blog search (they were previously).  It&#039;s at the point now where I have around 5 posts on different blogs referring to my post that appear in blog search (for &quot;post title&quot;), but my original post doesn&#039;t appear.

A blog search for &quot;fusednation&quot; returns no results, although &quot;fused nation&quot; does - but no pages from the site just the URL as a related blog.  It even shows a single reference on a comment on DaveNs blog but no pages from my blog.

I&#039;m not certain that authority / PageRank is related to the issue though - there are blogs with lower (TB) PR and have been around less time show up refering to my posts.

Offhand it seems that the site is simply removed from Blog Search results (but still returns as a result for a site name search).

No obvious reasons why - the site has a reasonable amount of links - new posts regular get linked to from other blogs - content is unique, etc.

No issues in Google sitemaps - a reasonable amount of Google feed subscribers, no content issues, variety of IBL text, sitemap downloaded regularly (and recently rebuilt it due to new design).  Plus the site has had over 15,000 visitors already this month (but only a small percentage from organic referrals).

The only thought I&#039;ve had is that the sitemap generator plugin produces an error trying to ping Google (when new posts are posted or old ones are edited).  I don&#039;t see how this would result in the blog being removed from blog search though - perhaps only affect new pages being included.  Given that new content can be live in regular search within minutes, I&#039;m assuming the ping works though.

Seems to be a new thing - only really noticed it since I changed the WP version to include G Blog incoming links instead of technorati.  Can&#039;t remember when that change was made, but within the past few months I think?

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noticed a similar issue with Fused Nation lately as well.</p>
<p>New posts are included the regular index almost instantly (no cache though) but not blog search (they were previously).  It&#8217;s at the point now where I have around 5 posts on different blogs referring to my post that appear in blog search (for &#8220;post title&#8221;), but my original post doesn&#8217;t appear.</p>
<p>A blog search for &#8220;fusednation&#8221; returns no results, although &#8220;fused nation&#8221; does &#8211; but no pages from the site just the URL as a related blog.  It even shows a single reference on a comment on DaveNs blog but no pages from my blog.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not certain that authority / PageRank is related to the issue though &#8211; there are blogs with lower (TB) PR and have been around less time show up refering to my posts.</p>
<p>Offhand it seems that the site is simply removed from Blog Search results (but still returns as a result for a site name search).</p>
<p>No obvious reasons why &#8211; the site has a reasonable amount of links &#8211; new posts regular get linked to from other blogs &#8211; content is unique, etc.</p>
<p>No issues in Google sitemaps &#8211; a reasonable amount of Google feed subscribers, no content issues, variety of IBL text, sitemap downloaded regularly (and recently rebuilt it due to new design).  Plus the site has had over 15,000 visitors already this month (but only a small percentage from organic referrals).</p>
<p>The only thought I&#8217;ve had is that the sitemap generator plugin produces an error trying to ping Google (when new posts are posted or old ones are edited).  I don&#8217;t see how this would result in the blog being removed from blog search though &#8211; perhaps only affect new pages being included.  Given that new content can be live in regular search within minutes, I&#8217;m assuming the ping works though.</p>
<p>Seems to be a new thing &#8211; only really noticed it since I changed the WP version to include G Blog incoming links instead of technorati.  Can&#8217;t remember when that change was made, but within the past few months I think?</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-704</guid>
		<description>Hi Shady

Of course, it might not be a penalty at all but it sure feels like it. I&#039;m double checking all I can at this end - it&#039;s quite time consuming. I&#039;m updating my version of Wordpress and my plugins first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shady</p>
<p>Of course, it might not be a penalty at all but it sure feels like it. I&#8217;m double checking all I can at this end &#8211; it&#8217;s quite time consuming. I&#8217;m updating my version of Wordpress and my plugins first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlightlyShadySEO</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>SlightlyShadySEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-710</guid>
		<description>I consider myself a smaller blog, but I&#039;m not seeing this penalty yet. Maybe because mine is still relatively new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider myself a smaller blog, but I&#8217;m not seeing this penalty yet. Maybe because mine is still relatively new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William - Neutralize</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>William - Neutralize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>I mean, to see if this is actually a &lt;i&gt;problem&lt;/i&gt; or whether Google has made a tweak to their algorithm which determines what time a site should be rechecked. It may be a cost saving exercise, which would make sense and then if you tell them a page is definitely new (via a sitemap) they would be more like to go and index it. If you think about it, it does make sense that an authoritative website gets indexed quicker....

Obviously this is just a random conclusion I have came to, however just because Google isn&#039;t indexing your website does not mean its a G problem, its probably more than likely a algorithm change and you shouldn&#039;t focus on &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; it has happened, but more so how to get around the problem ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, to see if this is actually a <i>problem</i> or whether Google has made a tweak to their algorithm which determines what time a site should be rechecked. It may be a cost saving exercise, which would make sense and then if you tell them a page is definitely new (via a sitemap) they would be more like to go and index it. If you think about it, it does make sense that an authoritative website gets indexed quicker&#8230;.</p>
<p>Obviously this is just a random conclusion I have came to, however just because Google isn&#8217;t indexing your website does not mean its a G problem, its probably more than likely a algorithm change and you shouldn&#8217;t focus on <i>why</i> it has happened, but more so how to get around the problem <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Hi William I only expected Google because that was the norm for 6 months previous.

Why would I need to add a xml sitemap? Up until a couple of weeks ago everything was rosy.... I shouldn&#039;t need to change anything if nothing&#039;s changed in the back end of this blog or at the Big G&#039;s end....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi William I only expected Google because that was the norm for 6 months previous.</p>
<p>Why would I need to add a xml sitemap? Up until a couple of weeks ago everything was rosy&#8230;. I shouldn&#8217;t need to change anything if nothing&#8217;s changed in the back end of this blog or at the Big G&#8217;s end&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William - Neutralize</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>William - Neutralize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-713</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t think you can &lt;i&gt;expect&lt;/i&gt; Google to come here that often, they do go through 20 petabytes indexing per day but unless they think you have updated then they won&#039;t come back, i think once every couple of days for a blog post on a smallish blog is reasonable! And they do allow you to ping them with your updated pages if you want!

I would recommend that your next step is to add a sitemaps, and see if that helps ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t think you can <i>expect</i> Google to come here that often, they do go through 20 petabytes indexing per day but unless they think you have updated then they won&#8217;t come back, i think once every couple of days for a blog post on a smallish blog is reasonable! And they do allow you to ping them with your updated pages if you want!</p>
<p>I would recommend that your next step is to add a sitemaps, and see if that helps <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-719</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy sorry I meant to get back to you. I think I am just pinging pingomatic but now ;) I&#039;ve turned on Pingshot so I will see if that makes a difference - thanks.

It doesn&#039;t change the fact something&#039;s changed as I don&#039;t really tamper about &#039;back there&#039; so to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy sorry I meant to get back to you. I think I am just pinging pingomatic but now <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;ve turned on Pingshot so I will see if that makes a difference &#8211; thanks.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t change the fact something&#8217;s changed as I don&#8217;t really tamper about &#8216;back there&#8217; so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-709</guid>
		<description>As mentioned by email, are you using pingshot, or your own ping list?

In my blogsearch exploration yesterday I saw a huge difference between what Google Blogsearch and Technorati were listing, though it didn&#039;t seem quality related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned by email, are you using pingshot, or your own ping list?</p>
<p>In my blogsearch exploration yesterday I saw a huge difference between what Google Blogsearch and Technorati were listing, though it didn&#8217;t seem quality related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double Glazed Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Double Glazed Windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-714</guid>
		<description>This post still isn&#039;t in nearly 2 days later....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post still isn&#8217;t in nearly 2 days later&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-715</guid>
		<description>@ William thanks for the comment but the sites you mention have an authority all of their own and would not be subject to the sort of &quot;lack of authority&quot; score which I would think would be the obvious reason for a change in how Google handles smaller blogs.


We&#039;re not likely to see &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;search engine land&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seroundtable.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SERoundtable&lt;/a&gt; suffer either. I&#039;m taking about the smaller seo blogs of which there are plenty.

I don&#039;t have a xml sitemap on this site - never needed one.

@ Sebastian sorry to hear keep an eye on it over the next few days</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ William thanks for the comment but the sites you mention have an authority all of their own and would not be subject to the sort of &#8220;lack of authority&#8221; score which I would think would be the obvious reason for a change in how Google handles smaller blogs.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not likely to see <a href="http://searchengineland.com">search engine land</a> or <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com">SERoundtable</a> suffer either. I&#8217;m taking about the smaller seo blogs of which there are plenty.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a xml sitemap on this site &#8211; never needed one.</p>
<p>@ Sebastian sorry to hear keep an eye on it over the next few days</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Ok, the requested test is done. Time to index = 1.5 hours. That&#039;s lame. It used to be a few minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, the requested test is done. Time to index = 1.5 hours. That&#8217;s lame. It used to be a few minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-711</guid>
		<description>Yup, tested it today, Google&#039;s BlitzIndexing is defunct or hates my blog all of a sudden. Google&#039;s Web search managed to index my Sphinn user profile (the RSS update) faster than my breaking news. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, tested it today, Google&#8217;s BlitzIndexing is defunct or hates my blog all of a sudden. Google&#8217;s Web search managed to index my Sphinn user profile (the RSS update) faster than my breaking news. <img src='http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William - Neutralize</title>
		<link>http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>William - Neutralize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/google-minty-freshness/#comment-702</guid>
		<description>That is strange, from tests done in-house we have seen something very different to that what you are seeing!

Try a different test, this time make a new blog, on www.blogspot.com and do some ping&#039;s and gauge the success you have there. Then make a Digg post, and gauge the success there, i&#039;m 90% sure what you are seeing is an anomaly and you should definitely see what you expect to see.

As a quick question, you are pinging this post to the common places right? And you do have a sitemap, with which you pinged the major search engines to &lt;i&gt;tell&lt;/i&gt; them that you have made an update? You can&#039;t just expect them to check your website all the time, it is very dependant on when the last crawl was! Crawl cycle average is 0.5 days between crawls even for the largest/authoritive of websites like engadget.com (source: seometer.com). If you ping your sitemaps i would assume a MUCH quicker discovery of your URL in the serps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is strange, from tests done in-house we have seen something very different to that what you are seeing!</p>
<p>Try a different test, this time make a new blog, on <a href="http://www.blogspot.com">http://www.blogspot.com</a> and do some ping&#8217;s and gauge the success you have there. Then make a Digg post, and gauge the success there, i&#8217;m 90% sure what you are seeing is an anomaly and you should definitely see what you expect to see.</p>
<p>As a quick question, you are pinging this post to the common places right? And you do have a sitemap, with which you pinged the major search engines to <i>tell</i> them that you have made an update? You can&#8217;t just expect them to check your website all the time, it is very dependant on when the last crawl was! Crawl cycle average is 0.5 days between crawls even for the largest/authoritive of websites like engadget.com (source: seometer.com). If you ping your sitemaps i would assume a MUCH quicker discovery of your URL in the serps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
